Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054286. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Categories help us make predictions, or inductions, about new objects. However, we cannot always be certain that a novel object belongs to the category we are using to make predictions. In such cases, people should use multiple categories to make inductions. Past research finds that people often use only the most likely category to make inductions, even if it is not certain. In two experiments, subjects read stories and answered questions about items whose categorization was uncertain. In Experiment 1, the less likely category was either emotionally neutral or dangerous (emotionally charged or likely to pose a threat). Subjects used multiple categories in induction when one of the categories was dangerous but not when they were all neutral. In Experiment 2, the most likely category was dangerous. Here, people used multiple categories, but there was also an effect of avoidance, in which people denied that dangerous categories were the most likely. The attention-grabbing power of dangerous categories may be balanced by a higher-level strategy to reject them.
类别可以帮助我们对新物体进行预测或归纳。然而,我们不能总是确定一个新物体是否属于我们用来进行预测的类别。在这种情况下,人们应该使用多个类别进行归纳。过去的研究发现,人们经常只使用最有可能的类别进行归纳,即使它不是确定的。在两个实验中,被试阅读故事并回答关于分类不确定的项目的问题。在实验 1 中,不太可能的类别是情绪中性或危险(情绪激动或可能构成威胁)。当一个类别是危险的,但不是所有类别都是中性的时候,被试在归纳中使用了多个类别。在实验 2 中,最有可能的类别是危险的。在这里,人们使用了多个类别,但也有一种回避效应,即人们否认危险类别是最有可能的。危险类别的引人注目的力量可能被拒绝它们的更高层次的策略所平衡。