Poreh Amir, Pastel Dan, Miller Ashley, Levin Jennifer
Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2012;19(2):147-52. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2011.643952.
During the past two decades, studies have repeatedly shown that the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST) is not as sensitive to prefrontal-lobe functioning as was originally suspected. Specifically, both clinical and brain-imaging studies have shown that several distinct neural circuits contribute to one's ability to successfully complete different aspects of the test. Another limitation of the WCST is its length, which makes it difficult and frustrating for certain clinical populations. To address the above limitations, researchers have proposed the development of new indexes and the integration of an adaptive testing approach that will allow for the premature termination of the test. Unfortunately, given the proprietary nature of the WCST, none of the above recommendations have been adopted. The present preliminary study examined an alternate form of the 64-Item WCST (WCST-64), the Cleveland Sorting Test (CST-64). The normative data of the two measures as well as the total number of errors, perseverative responses, perseverative errors, and categories completed were compared using a repeated-measures design. Overall, the study supports psychometric approximation of the CST-64 and the WCST-64. Suggestions for future studies and modifications of the CST-64, including the use of recently proposed indexes and adaptive administration approaches, are provided.
在过去二十年中,研究反复表明,威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)对前额叶功能的敏感性并不像最初怀疑的那样高。具体而言,临床研究和脑成像研究均表明,有几个不同的神经回路有助于个体成功完成该测验不同方面的能力。WCST的另一个局限性在于其长度,这使得某些临床人群进行该测验既困难又令人沮丧。为了解决上述局限性,研究人员提议开发新的指标,并整合一种自适应测试方法,以便能够提前终止测验。不幸的是,鉴于WCST的专有性质,上述建议均未被采纳。本初步研究考察了64项WCST(WCST-64)的一种替代形式,即克利夫兰分类测验(CST-64)。使用重复测量设计比较了这两种测量方法的常模数据以及错误总数、持续性反应、持续性错误和完成的类别数。总体而言,该研究支持CST-64和WCST-64在心理测量学上的近似性。文中还提供了对未来研究的建议以及对CST-64的修改建议,包括使用最近提出的指标和自适应施测方法。