University of Saskatchewan, Department of Biology, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5E2.
Water Res. 2013 Apr 1;47(5):1816-26. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
A fundamental step in the management of nutrient impacted water bodies is the determination of the type and degree of nutrient limitation. However, nutrient deficiency indicators often provide inconsistent results. Recent advances in the measurement of phosphate concentrations may provide a better means to understand results from P deficiency indicators. With regards to phosphorus, deficiency indicators should predict P-limitation when phosphate concentrations are consistently low. We use this new understanding to examine the relationships between phosphate concentration and P deficiency. Patterns of steady state phosphate (ssPO(4)(3-)) concentrations and P deficiency were evaluated in 109 lakes located across Canada. Lakes encompassed a broad range in TP concentration (1.79-139.7 μg L(-1)). The relationships between ssPO(4)(3-) concentrations and simultaneously measured total P (TP), total dissolved P (TDP) and soluble reactive P (SRP) concentrations, particulate C:P and N:P ratios, alkaline phosphatase activities (APA) and phosphate turnover times (TT) were analyzed. ssPO(4)(3-) was positively correlated with TP and TDP. The ssPO(4)(3-) concentrations were 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than SRP concentrations. These two measures were only weakly correlated, suggesting that SRP is a major overestimate of PO(4)(3-). The ssPO(4)(3-) concentrations were negatively correlated with C:P and N:P ratios, and with APA, consistent with expectations. When only lakes with TT < 15 min were considered, TT was negatively correlated with TP, challenging the idea that nutrients become less limiting in more eutrophic systems. Overall, P deficiency indicators related to ssPO(4)(3-) in the expected manner. However, variability in relationships with APA and particulate stoichiometry emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of P deficiency measurements. We recommend simultaneous use of multiple techniques to confidently assess P deficiency.
在受营养物质影响的水体管理中,基本步骤是确定营养物质限制的类型和程度。然而,营养缺乏指标往往提供不一致的结果。最近在磷酸盐浓度测量方面的进展可能提供了更好的方法来理解 P 缺乏指标的结果。就磷而言,当磷酸盐浓度持续较低时,缺乏指标应预测 P 限制。我们利用这一新的认识来检验磷酸盐浓度与 P 缺乏之间的关系。在加拿大各地的 109 个湖泊中评估了稳态磷酸盐 (ssPO(4)(3-)) 浓度和 P 缺乏的模式。湖泊涵盖了总磷 (TP) 浓度的广泛范围(1.79-139.7 μg L(-1))。分析了 ssPO(4)(3-) 浓度与同时测量的总磷 (TP)、总溶解磷 (TDP) 和可溶性反应磷 (SRP) 浓度、颗粒 C:P 和 N:P 比、碱性磷酸酶活性 (APA) 和磷酸盐周转时间 (TT) 之间的关系。ssPO(4)(3-) 与 TP 和 TDP 呈正相关。ssPO(4)(3-) 浓度比 SRP 浓度低 2-3 个数量级。这两个措施仅弱相关,表明 SRP 是 PO(4)(3-) 的主要高估。ssPO(4)(3-) 浓度与 C:P 和 N:P 比呈负相关,与 APA 呈负相关,这与预期一致。当仅考虑 TT < 15 min 的湖泊时,TT 与 TP 呈负相关,这对营养物质在富营养化系统中变得不那么限制的观点提出了挑战。总体而言,与 ssPO(4)(3-) 相关的 P 缺乏指标以预期的方式相关。然而,与 APA 和颗粒化学计量学的关系的变异性强调了谨慎解释 P 缺乏测量的必要性。我们建议同时使用多种技术来自信地评估 P 缺乏。