Suppr超能文献

教育项目有效性评估中结果的测量。

The measurement of outcomes in the assessment of educational program effectiveness.

作者信息

Kassebaum D G

机构信息

Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C. 20036.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1990 May;65(5):293-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199005000-00003.

Abstract

Postsecondary accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education and the Council on Postsecondary Accreditation, including the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), are required to evaluate educational program effectiveness by determining that institutions and programs document the achievement of their students and graduates in verifiable and consistent ways, indicating that institutional and program purposes are met. For the assessment of medical education programs this represents a departure from the traditional method of inferring quality from institutional compliance with standards for program organization and function. In the new assessment calculus, success is measured as the integrated product of the outcomes, the indicators of achievement that medical schools already are collecting from many sources, for instance, data on premedical achievement and attributes, medical school performance, graduate education ratings and test results, specialty certification, licensure, and practice. Although a recent LCME enquiry showed that 80% of U.S. medical schools were collecting outcome data on students and graduates, there was a lack of coherence and system, little integrated analysis, rare longitudinal study, and limited use of the information to evaluate and revise the curriculum or to validate admissions, promotion, and graduation criteria. The longitudinal study of the quantified results of educational programs need not resurrect old controversies about the linkage between learning in medical school and the quality of doctors' later practice. The purpose of examining outcomes is to gain sharper focus on the achievement of distinctive institutional goals, to facilitate program improvement and renewal, and to better assure the competence of graduates within the boundaries of achievement that schools have drawn as their educational objectives.

摘要

美国教育部和高等教育认证委员会认可的高等教育认证机构,包括医学教育联络委员会(LCME),必须通过确定机构和项目以可验证且一致的方式记录其学生和毕业生的成就,表明机构和项目目标得以实现,来评估教育项目的有效性。对于医学教育项目的评估而言,这与传统的从机构对项目组织和功能标准的遵守情况推断质量的方法有所不同。在新的评估计算方法中,成功是以结果的综合产物来衡量的,这些结果是医学院已经从许多来源收集的成就指标,例如,关于医学预科成就和特质、医学院表现、研究生教育评级和考试结果、专业认证、执照和实践的数据。尽管LCME最近的一项调查显示,80%的美国医学院正在收集学生和毕业生的结果数据,但存在缺乏连贯性和系统性、很少进行综合分析、罕见纵向研究以及对这些信息在评估和修订课程或验证招生、晋升和毕业标准方面的使用有限等问题。对教育项目量化结果的纵向研究不必重新引发关于医学院学习与医生后期实践质量之间联系的旧有争议。检查结果的目的是更清晰地关注独特机构目标的实现,促进项目改进和更新,并在学校作为教育目标所划定的成就范围内更好地确保毕业生的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验