Blumberg Phyllis
Teaching and Learning Center, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Summer;15(3):210-4. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1503_10.
To be accredited, schools must evaluate the effectiveness of their programs. Educators are looking for specific indicators beyond the traditional measures. Data from multiple methods, including indicators of student performance and of the institutional environment, can be used to determine if educational program goals are met.
This article outlines specific ways to consider three types of efficacy outcomes that are consistent with accreditation guidelines: educational, clinical career, and environmental outcomes. Specific measurable outcomes for each of these categories are derived from higher education literature: for example, learning approaches and information acquisition for education; professional behaviors and interpersonal dimensions for clinical career, and scholarship of teaching and teaching itself as a shared and valued activity for environmental outcomes. These outcomes address student assessment and program evaluation. Data from problem-based learning programs illustrate these outcomes.
Educators can determine if educational program innovations have met their goals by collecting efficacy outcome data.
为获得认证,学校必须评估其项目的有效性。教育工作者正在寻找超越传统衡量标准的具体指标。来自多种方法的数据,包括学生成绩指标和机构环境指标,可用于确定教育项目目标是否达成。
本文概述了与认证指南一致的三种类型的效能结果的具体考量方式:教育、临床职业和环境结果。这些类别中每一类的具体可衡量结果均源自高等教育文献:例如,教育方面的学习方法和信息获取;临床职业方面的专业行为和人际维度;以及环境结果方面的教学学术和教学本身作为一项共享且有价值的活动。这些结果涉及学生评估和项目评价。基于问题的学习项目的数据阐释了这些结果。
教育工作者可以通过收集效能结果数据来确定教育项目创新是否实现了其目标。