• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用不同固定技术进行前交叉韧带重建术后的隧道扩大情况:使用可生物降解挤压螺钉的骨隧道固定与使用悬吊皮质纽扣的全内置技术。一项前瞻性随机试验的5年数据。

Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Eichinger Martin, Ploner Martin, Degenhart Gerald, Rudisch Ansgar, Smekal Vinzenz, Attal René, Mayr Raul

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, a.ö. Bezirkskrankenhaus St. Johann in Tirol, Tirol, Austria.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6707-6718. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05001-x. Epub 2023 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-023-05001-x
PMID:37542556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10541822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to examine tunnel widening and clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using two different fixation methods: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside ACLR with suspensory cortical buttons.

METHODS

Tunnel widening was assessed using volumetric and diameter measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans directly after surgery, as well as 6 months and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed after 5 years with instrumented tibial anteroposterior translation measurement (KT-1000), single-leg hop testing, and the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the study population consisted of 21 patients, 12 of whom underwent screw fixation and 9 of whom had button fixation. 3 patients with all-inside ACLR had sustained early repeat ruptures within 6 months after surgery and had to be excluded from the further analysis. With screw fixation, the tibial tunnel volume changed significantly more over time compared to all-inside button fixation, with a larger initial increase at 6 months (from postoperative 2.9 ± 0.2 to 3.3 ± 0.2 cm at 6 months versus 1.7 ± 0.1 to 1.9 ± 0.2 cm) and a greater final decrease over 2-5 years postoperatively (from 3.1 ± 0.2 to 1.9 ± 0.2 cm versus 1.8 ± 0.2 ± 0.1 to 1.3 ± 0.1 cm) (P < 0.001). The femoral tunnel volume remained comparable between the two groups throughout the follow-up period, with an initial 1.6 ± 0.1 cm in both groups and 1.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.1 after 5 years in the screw and button groups, respectively (P ≥ 0.314). The maximum tibial and femoral tunnel diameters were significantly larger with screw fixation at all four time points. Tibial diameters measured 11.1 ± 0.2, 12.3 ± 0.3, 12.3 ± 0.4, and 11.2 ± 0.4 mm in the screw group versus 8.1 ± 0.3, 8.9 ± 0.3, 9.1 ± 0.4 and 8.2 ± 0.5 mm in the button group (P < 0.001). Femoral diameters measured 8.6 ± 0.2, 10.5 ± 0.4, 10.2 ± 0.3, and 8.9 ± 0.3 versus 7.3 ± 0.3, 8.4 ± 0.4, 8.4 ± 0.3, 7.5 ± 0.3, respectively (P ≤ 0.007). Four patients (33%) in the screw group exceeded a diameter of 12 mm on the tibial side after 5 years versus none in the button group (not significant, P = 0.104). Tibial anteroposterior translation measurement with KT-1000 after 5 years was 2.3 ± 2.4 mm in the screw group versus 3.2 ± 3.5 mm in the button group (not significant, P = 0.602). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the other clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Tibial tunnels in ACLR with screw fixation were associated with a larger increase in tunnel volume within the first 2 years and a greater decrease up to 5 years after surgery, while femoral tunnel volumes did not differ significantly. On the tibial side, the need for staged revision ACLR may be greater after biodegradable interference screw fixation if repeat ruptures occur, especially within the first 2 years after primary ACLR. Concerns may remain regarding a higher graft failure rate with all-inside ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

RCT CONSORT

NCT01755819.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较两种不同固定方法在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后的隧道扩大情况及临床疗效:使用可生物降解挤压螺钉的骨隧道固定法与采用悬吊皮质纽扣的全内置ACLR法。

方法

通过术后即刻、术后6个月以及术后2年和5年的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,采用容积测量和直径测量评估隧道扩大情况。术后5年,通过仪器测量胫骨前后向平移(KT - 1000)、单腿跳测试以及IKDC、Lysholm和Tegner活动评分评估临床疗效。

结果

在最终随访时,研究对象包括21例患者,其中12例行螺钉固定,9例行纽扣固定。3例接受全内置ACLR的患者在术后6个月内早期再次发生断裂,因此被排除在进一步分析之外。与全内置纽扣固定相比,螺钉固定时胫骨隧道容积随时间变化更为显著,术后6个月时初始增加幅度更大(术后2.9±0.2至6个月时3.3±0.2 cm,而纽扣固定组为1.7±0.1至1.9±0.2 cm),术后2 - 5年最终减小幅度更大(从3.1±0.2至1.9±0.2 cm,纽扣固定组为1.8±0.2±0.1至1.3±0.1 cm)(P < 0.001)。在整个随访期间,两组股骨隧道容积相当,两组初始均为1.6±0.1 cm,螺钉组和纽扣组术后5年分别为1.2±0.1和1.3±0.1 cm(P≥0.314)。在所有四个时间点,螺钉固定时胫骨和股骨隧道的最大直径均显著更大。螺钉组胫骨直径分别为11.1±0.2、12.3±0.3、12.3±0.4和11.2±0.4 mm,纽扣组为8.1±0.3、8.9±0.3、9.1±0.4和8.2±0.5 mm(P < 0.001)。股骨直径分别为8.6±0.2、10.5±0.4、10.2±0.3和8.9±0.3,纽扣组分别为7.3±0.3、8.4±0.4、8.4±0.3和7.5±0.3(P≤0.007)。5年后,螺钉组4例患者(33%)胫骨侧直径超过12 mm,纽扣组无此情况(无显著性差异,P = 0.104)。术后5年,螺钉组KT - 1000测量的胫骨前后向平移为2.3±2.4 mm,纽扣组为3.2±3.5 mm(无显著性差异,P = 0.602)。在其他任何临床疗效方面,两组之间均无显著差异。

结论

采用螺钉固定的ACLR中,胫骨隧道在术后前2年容积增加更大,术后5年减小幅度更大,而股骨隧道容积无显著差异。在胫骨侧,如果发生再次断裂,尤其是在初次ACLR后的前2年内,采用可生物降解挤压螺钉固定后可能更需要分期进行ACLR翻修。对于全内置ACLR较高的移植物失败率可能仍存在担忧。

证据水平

II。

随机对照试验注册编号

NCT01755819。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/13ece10bb48d/402_2023_5001_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/1efdb9e73325/402_2023_5001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/56a7a8aeb01f/402_2023_5001_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/1dc57635b58b/402_2023_5001_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/13ece10bb48d/402_2023_5001_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/1efdb9e73325/402_2023_5001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/56a7a8aeb01f/402_2023_5001_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/1dc57635b58b/402_2023_5001_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034a/10541822/13ece10bb48d/402_2023_5001_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial.采用不同固定技术进行前交叉韧带重建术后的隧道扩大情况:使用可生物降解挤压螺钉的骨隧道固定与使用悬吊皮质纽扣的全内置技术。一项前瞻性随机试验的5年数据。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6707-6718. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05001-x. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
2
ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.ACL 重建中采用可调节长度环皮质纽扣固定法可减少胫骨隧道扩宽,与干扰螺钉固定法相比。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1036-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05642-9. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with aperture screw fixation or all-inside reconstruction with suspensory cortical button fixation: Volumetric measurements on CT and MRI scans.采用骨隧道扩大技术的前交叉韧带重建:使用带孔螺钉固定或采用悬吊皮质纽扣全内置重建:CT和MRI扫描的容积测量
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1047-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.采用带袢钢板皮质纽扣全内置固定技术进行前交叉韧带重建手术是否为更优术式?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 7;21(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03471-3.
5
Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.可调环皮质骨悬吊固定在初次前交叉韧带重建中比交锁螺钉固定更能增加胫骨隧道增宽。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 1;58(9):1193. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091193.
6
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.前交叉韧带重建时,使用可吸收螺钉比全内技术伴悬吊固定时胫骨隧道增宽更大。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2577-2584. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5275-x. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
PEEK Interference Screws Show Significant Tunnel Enlargement After ACL Reconstruction and is Comparable to Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Button Fixation.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)干涉螺钉在 ACL 重建术后显示出明显的隧道扩大,且与可调长度环皮质纽扣固定相当。
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Nov 19;58(1):40-47. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01029-8. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Comparative Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Full Tibial Tunnel: Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw and Staple Fixation.全胫骨隧道前交叉韧带重建的比较结果:四股半腱肌悬吊股骨和胫骨固定与四股半腱肌和股薄肌悬吊股骨和胫骨螺钉及U形钉固定的比较
J Knee Surg. 2023 Aug;36(10):1069-1076. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749396. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
Cortical Suspensory Button Versus Aperture Interference Screw Fixation for Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft-Tissue Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.皮质悬吊纽扣与孔径干涉螺钉固定用于膝关节前交叉韧带软组织同种异体移植:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep;31(9):1733-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
10
Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.前交叉韧带重建术后 2 年的前向松弛度,使用可调环袢悬吊固定和干扰螺钉固定时无明显差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2366-2375. doi: 10.1177/0363546518784005. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone Quality-Independent Tibial Fixation Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中与骨质量无关的胫骨固定技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 May 16;14(7):103619. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103619. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Bioabsorbable implants are a viable alternative to traditional metallic implants in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物可吸收植入物在骨科手术中是传统金属植入物的可行替代方案:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2025 Jun 14;65:257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.005. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Morphometric Analysis of the Tibial Tunnel after Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Eccentrically widened bone tunnels after all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a computed tomography and three-dimensional model-based analysis.全内视镜前十字韧带重建术后骨隧道偏心增宽:计算机断层扫描与三维模型分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jun;31(6):2374-2385. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07164-3. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction.胫骨隧道扩大受胫骨混合固定中隧道直径-螺钉比的影响,用于腘绳肌腱 ACL 重建。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):1923-1930. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
初次及翻修前交叉韧带重建术后胫骨隧道的形态学分析
Malays Orthop J. 2025 Mar;19(1):66-76. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2503.009.
4
Outcomes of remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts: A retrospective analysis of tibial tunnel widening and complications.使用跟腱异体移植物保留残端的前交叉韧带重建的结果:胫骨隧道扩大及并发症的回顾性分析
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 4;12(2):e70231. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70231. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Arthroscopic Bone Grafting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial and Femoral Tunnels as a First-Stage Procedure.关节镜下前交叉韧带和后交叉韧带胫骨与股骨隧道的骨移植作为一期手术
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Aug 17;14(2):103201. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103201. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
[Effectiveness of lower tibial tunnel placement combined with internal tension relieving suture in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].[胫骨隧道低位放置联合内部张力缓解缝线在后交叉韧带重建中的有效性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 15;38(11):1340-1345. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202407094.
7
Inside-out tibial tunnel drilling technique is a reliable approach for all-inside ACL reconstruction: A longitudinal MRI assessment.经胫骨隧道由外向内钻孔技术是全关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的可靠方法:一项MRI纵向评估
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Nov 10;11(4):e70068. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70068. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Graft Failure and Contralateral ACL Injuries After Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using Interpretable Machine Learning.初次前交叉韧带重建术后移植物失败及对侧前交叉韧带损伤:基于可解释机器学习的危险因素分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 23;12(10):23259671241282316. doi: 10.1177/23259671241282316. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
A Comprehensive Review of Graft Choices and Surgical Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome Analysis.前交叉韧带初次重建中移植物选择与手术技术的综合综述:一项结果分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 5;16(9):e68701. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68701. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Selection of Interferential Screw for Fixation of Graft in Tibial Tunnel during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Novel Probe Test.新型探针测试在前交叉韧带重建中用于胫骨隧道内移植物固定的干扰螺钉的选择
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Jul;14(7):172-178. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i07.4618.
Adjustable suspension versus hybrid fixation in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
可调式悬吊与混合固定在腘绳肌腱自体移植物前交叉韧带重建中的应用比较。
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
4
Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.采用带袢钢板皮质纽扣全内置固定技术进行前交叉韧带重建手术是否为更优术式?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 7;21(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03471-3.
5
Cancellous allogenic and autologous bone grafting ensure comparable tunnel filling results in two-staged revision ACL surgery.松质同种异体和自体骨移植可确保二期翻修 ACL 手术中隧道填充具有可比性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Sep;140(9):1211-1219. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03421-7. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
6
ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.ACL 重建中采用可调节长度环皮质纽扣固定法可减少胫骨隧道扩宽,与干扰螺钉固定法相比。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1036-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05642-9. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.前交叉韧带重建时,使用可吸收螺钉比全内技术伴悬吊固定时胫骨隧道增宽更大。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2577-2584. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5275-x. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
8
Adjustable buttons for ACL graft cortical fixation partially fail with cyclic loading and unloading.可调节 ACL 移植物皮质固定纽扣在循环加载和卸载时部分失效。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2530-2536. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5262-2. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
9
Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.前交叉韧带重建术后 2 年的前向松弛度,使用可调环袢悬吊固定和干扰螺钉固定时无明显差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2366-2375. doi: 10.1177/0363546518784005. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
10
Editorial Commentary: The Quest to Prevent Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Bone Tunnel Widening Continues.社论评论:继续探索预防膝关节前交叉韧带骨隧道增宽的方法。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2228-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.005.