Obata Jyun-Ei, Nakamura Takamitsu, Kitta Yoshinobu, Saito Yukio, Sano Keita, Fujioka Daisuke, Kawabata Ken-Ichi, Kugiyama Kiyotaka
Department of Internal Medicine II, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Japan.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 15;82(6):E777-87. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24841. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
This study examined whether sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation exerts an antiproliferative action on a bare metal stent (BMS) placed distally in the same coronary artery.
Diffusion of sirolimus into flowing coronary blood may cause accumulation of this drug in the coronary bed beyond the distal edge of an SES.
We analyzed data from 115 consecutive patients with ischemic heart disease who were treated with two overlapping stents without a gap in the same coronary artery for a long de novo lesion. The distal stent was a 2.25 mm BMS in all patients, and the proximal stent was an SES in 73 patients (SES-BMS group) and a BMS in 42 patients (BMS-BMS group). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed at stent implantation and 8 months later.
Clinical and procedural variables were comparable between the two groups. QCA and IVUS showed that the SES-BMS group had less luminal late loss and a lower percent of in-stent volume obstruction in the distal BMS compared with the BMS-BMS group. Furthermore, compared with the BMS-BMS group, the SES-BMS group had less in-stent restenosis (23.3 vs. 54.8%, P < 0.0005) and target lesion revascularization (21.9 vs. 50.0%, P < 0.005).
SES implantation just proximal to a BMS inhibits neointimal proliferation in the BMS, when both stents are implanted in the same coronary artery to treat a de novo lesion.
本研究旨在探讨西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)植入术是否会对置于同一冠状动脉远端的裸金属支架(BMS)产生抗增殖作用。
西罗莫司扩散至流动的冠状动脉血液中可能导致该药物在SES远端边缘以外的冠状动脉床中蓄积。
我们分析了115例连续性缺血性心脏病患者的数据,这些患者在同一冠状动脉中接受了两个无间隙重叠的支架治疗长节段初发病变。所有患者的远端支架均为2.25 mm的BMS,近端支架在73例患者中为SES(SES-BMS组),在42例患者中为BMS(BMS-BMS组)。在支架植入时及8个月后进行定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和血管内超声(IVUS)检查。
两组之间的临床和手术变量具有可比性。QCA和IVUS显示,与BMS-BMS组相比,SES-BMS组远端BMS的管腔晚期丢失较少,支架内体积阻塞百分比更低。此外,与BMS-BMS组相比,SES-BMS组的支架内再狭窄较少(23.3%对54.8%,P<0.0005),靶病变血运重建较少(21.9%对50.0%,P<0.005)。
当两个支架都植入同一冠状动脉以治疗初发病变时,在BMS近端植入SES可抑制BMS内的新生内膜增殖。