Suppr超能文献

上下影响影响了象甲甲虫个体的表现,但没有影响其在野外的种群密度。

Bottom-up and top-down effects influence bruchid beetle individual performance but not population densities in the field.

机构信息

Unit of Ecology & Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055317. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

Abstract

Plant quality (bottom-up) and natural enemies (top-down) can influence the individual performance of herbivorous insects on their host plants, but few studies measured at the same time the influence on population densities in the field. We investigated if plant quality of different wild common bean populations, Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae), affects the performance of the bean weevil, Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), and one of its enemies, the ectoparasitoid Dinarmus basalis (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), in controlled laboratory experiments. Additionally, we examined if parasitoids influence the beetles' development and if increased individual beetle and parasitoid fitness lead to higher field population densities. We show that bean quality and parasitoids affected individual bean weevil performance under laboratory and field conditions. In the presence of parasitoids, fewer and smaller beetles emerged. However, beetle and parasitoid performance were not correlated. Increased individual performance was not leading to higher population densities; we found no correlations between measured performance components and beetle field infestation levels or parasitism rates. We conclude that bottom-up or top-down effects measured at the individual level do not always translate into population effects; therefore it is important to discriminate between effects acting on individual insects and those acting on populations.

摘要

植物质量(自下而上)和天敌(自上而下)会影响草食性昆虫在其宿主植物上的个体表现,但很少有研究同时测量其对田间种群密度的影响。我们研究了不同野生普通菜豆种群(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)(豆科)的植物质量是否会影响豆象 Acanthoscelides obtectus(Say)(鞘翅目:豆象科)及其一种天敌、外寄生蜂 Dinarmus basalis(Rondani)(膜翅目:金小蜂科)的表现,这是在控制实验室实验中进行的。此外,我们还研究了寄生蜂是否会影响甲虫的发育,以及个体甲虫和寄生蜂的适应性是否会导致更高的田间种群密度。我们表明,在实验室和田间条件下,豆质量和寄生蜂会影响个体豆象的表现。在寄生蜂存在的情况下,出现的甲虫数量更少、体型更小。然而,甲虫和寄生蜂的表现并没有相关性。个体表现的提高并不会导致种群密度的增加;我们没有发现所测量的性能成分与甲虫田间侵染水平或寄生率之间存在相关性。我们得出的结论是,在个体水平上测量的自上而下或自下而上的影响并不总是转化为种群影响;因此,区分作用于个体昆虫的影响和作用于种群的影响非常重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
10
What drives community dynamics?是什么驱动了群落动态?
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 22;276(1669):2923-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0523. Epub 2009 May 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验