Shigeta Shogo, Shimada Muneaki, Tsuji Keita, Nagai Tomoyuki, Tanase Yasuhito, Matsuo Koji, Kamiura Shoji, Iwata Takashi, Yokota Harushige, Mikami Mikio
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep;27(9):1507-1515. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02198-6. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Adjuvant therapy is usually considered for surgically treated patients with uterine cervical cancer harboring intermediate risk (IR) factors such as large tumor diameter, stromal invasion to the outer half, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). However, the indications and types of adjuvant therapy for the IR group remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the differences in patient outcomes in the IR group to provide novel insights for tailoring adjuvant therapy.
Data from 6192 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy at 116 institutions belonging to the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group were reviewed.
In total, 1688 patients were classified into the IR group, of whom 37.3% did not receive adjuvant therapy. Conversely, approximately equal proportions of the remaining patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Patients with all three risk factors showed worse overall survival than those with one or two risk factors. In addition to LVSI, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, and vaginal invasion were identified as independent risk factors for both recurrence and mortality in multivariate analyses. Tumor diameter greater than 40 mm and surgical center volume were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence. Stromal invasion to the outer half and ovarian metastasis were identified as independent risk factors for mortality.
This study revealed the significant differences in prognosis in the IR group. The indications for adjuvant therapy should be further studied, focusing on conventional risk factors and other pathological findings.
对于接受手术治疗且具有中等风险(IR)因素(如肿瘤直径大、间质浸润至外半层和淋巴管血管间隙浸润(LVSI))的子宫颈癌患者,通常会考虑辅助治疗。然而,IR组辅助治疗的适应证和类型仍存在争议。本研究旨在分析IR组患者预后的差异,为定制辅助治疗提供新的见解。
回顾了日本妇科肿瘤学组所属116家机构6192例接受根治性子宫切除术的宫颈癌患者的数据。
共有1688例患者被归类为IR组,其中37.3%未接受辅助治疗。相反,其余患者中接受辅助放疗、同步放化疗和化疗的比例大致相等。具有所有三个风险因素的患者总体生存率低于具有一个或两个风险因素的患者。在多变量分析中,除LVSI外,非鳞状细胞癌组织学和阴道浸润被确定为复发和死亡的独立风险因素。肿瘤直径大于40mm和手术中心容量被确定为复发的独立风险因素。间质浸润至外半层和卵巢转移被确定为死亡的独立风险因素。
本研究揭示了IR组预后的显著差异。应进一步研究辅助治疗的适应证,重点关注传统风险因素和其他病理结果。