Laboratory Epsylon EA 4556, Dynamics of Human Abilities and Health Behaviors, University of Montpellier 1, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint-Loup, 34090, Montpellier, France,
Int J Behav Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):402-10. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9292-3.
Processes of change (POC) are constructs from the transtheoretical model that propose to examine how people engage in a behavior. However, there is no consensus about a leading model explaining POC and there is no validated French POC scale in physical activity
This study aimed to compare the different existing models to validate a French POC scale.
Three studies, with 748 subjects included, were carried out to translate the items and evaluate their clarity (study 1, n = 77), to assess the factorial validity (n = 200) and invariance/equivalence (study 2, n = 471), and to analyze the concurrent validity by stage × process analyses (study 3, n = 671).
Two models displayed adequate fit to the data; however, based on the Akaike information criterion, the fully correlated five-factor model appeared as the most appropriate to measure POC in physical activity. The invariance/equivalence was also confirmed across genders and student status. Four of the five existing factors discriminated pre-action and post-action stages.
These data support the validation of the POC questionnaire in physical activity among a French sample. More research is needed to explore the longitudinal properties of this scale.
改变过程(POC)是来自跨理论模型的构建,旨在研究人们如何参与行为。然而,目前还没有关于主导模型的共识,也没有经过验证的法语活动身体 POC 量表。
本研究旨在比较不同现有的模型,以验证法语 POC 量表。
进行了三项研究,共纳入 748 名受试者,用于翻译项目并评估其清晰度(研究 1,n=77),评估因子有效性(n=200)和不变性/等效性(研究 2,n=471),并通过阶段×过程分析(研究 3,n=671)分析同时效度。
两种模型均与数据拟合良好;然而,根据赤池信息量准则,完全相关的五因素模型似乎是测量身体活动中 POC 的最合适模型。性别和学生身份的不变性/等效性也得到了证实。现有的五个因素中的四个因素可以区分前行动和后行动阶段。
这些数据支持了法语样本中 POC 问卷在身体活动中的验证。需要进一步研究来探索该量表的纵向特性。