Johnson C A, Keltner J L, Balestrery F G
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.
Ophthalmology. 1979 Jul;86(7):1278-86. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35399-4.
Comparisons between automated suprathreshold static perimetry and manual kinetic perimetry were performed for 226 eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, and 147 eyes with other optic nerve disease. Both techniques produced similar high detection rates for glaucomatous visual field defects, whereas suprathreshold static perimetry performed significantly better than kinetic testing in optic nerve disease other than glaucoma. It is concluded that automated suprathreshold static perimetry is an excellent quantitative screening technique for detecting visual field defects.
对226只患有青光眼或高眼压症的眼睛以及147只患有其他视神经疾病的眼睛进行了自动超阈值静态视野检查与手动动态视野检查的比较。两种技术对青光眼性视野缺损均产生了相似的高检出率，而在青光眼以外的视神经疾病中，超阈值静态视野检查的表现明显优于动态检查。得出的结论是，自动超阈值静态视野检查是检测视野缺损的一种出色的定量筛查技术。
