Ellis Leonie, Showell Chris, Turner Paul
eHealth services Research Group, University of Tasmania.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:291-5.
This paper compares two social media sites that aim to support patients to enhance self-management. The first site, PatientsLikeMe is a well established global site designed to allow peer-to-peer communication between people with similar conditions. The second, HealthShare, is a recently developed site for Australians described as "Australia's Social Health Network". The comparison conducted examines the purpose, ownership, and design of both sites as well as how the data they collect is used. Analysis highlights that PatientsLikeMe actively facilitates patient self-management, while HealthShare is revealed to be a professionally moderated health information portal presented as a social networking site. While the impetus for the development of PatientsLikeMe is clear, the motives underpinning HealthShare are less obvious. With increasing patient interest in connecting with, and sharing information with one another, awareness of the nature and motivations underpinning sites that provide these services is of increasing relevance.
本文比较了两个旨在支持患者加强自我管理的社交媒体网站。第一个网站PatientsLikeMe是一个成熟的全球网站,旨在让患有相似病症的人进行点对点交流。第二个网站HealthShare是一个最近为澳大利亚人开发的网站,被描述为“澳大利亚社会健康网络”。所进行的比较考察了两个网站的目的、所有权、设计以及它们所收集数据的使用方式。分析突出表明,PatientsLikeMe积极促进患者自我管理,而HealthShare则被揭示为一个作为社交网站呈现的由专业人员主持的健康信息门户。虽然PatientsLikeMe的发展动力很明确,但支撑HealthShare的动机则不太明显。随着患者对相互联系和分享信息的兴趣日益增加,了解提供这些服务的网站的性质和动机变得越来越重要。