Department of Radiation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Mar;23(3):494-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318280824d.
Although outcomes for surgery versus radiotherapy (RT) for stage IB patients are similar, young women are often preferentially treated with surgery rather than RT. Adjuvant RT is indicated for high-risk patients after surgery. Our goal was to study the impact of race and partner status on patterns of care of young women with stage I cervical cancer.
We identified a cohort of 6586 women, aged 15 to 39 years, in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database diagnosed with stage I cervical cancer between 1988 and 2007.
In our cohort, 93% (n = 5080) of white women had surgery, and 86.5% (n = 985) of nonwhite women had surgery as primary treatment. On multivariate analysis, higher FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage (IA2 odds ratio [OR] 3.09 [P = 0.01]; IB OR, 21.41 [P < 0.001]), widowed/single (OR, 1.39; P = 0.02), squamous histology (OR, 1.69; P < 0.001), diagnosis during 1993-1997 time period (OR, 1.69; P < 0.001), and nonwhite race (OR, 1.95; P ≤ 0.001) were more likely to receive RT as primary treatment. Of the surgical patients, 15.45% of white women versus 20.4% in the nonwhite women (P < 0.001) had high-risk disease, and 66% of the white women versus 71% of the nonwhite women received adjuvant RT (P = 0.136). Race and marital status were not significant predictors of receiving adjuvant RT on multivariate analysis. Predictors of worse overall survival included RT as primary treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; P < 0.001) and nonwhite race (HR, 1.6; P = 0.001). Marital status was not a significant predictor of overall survival. Race was a significant predictor of survival for women who received surgery as primary treatment (nonwhite HR, 1.93; P < 0.001).
Nonwhites are more likely than whites to have RT as primary treatment. This suggests that nonwhite women may have social/cultural barriers impacting their treatment decision making or may have a higher likelihood of other comorbidities that limit their surgical options.
尽管手术与放疗(RT)治疗 IB 期患者的结果相似,但年轻女性通常更倾向于接受手术而不是 RT。手术后高危患者需要辅助 RT。我们的目标是研究种族和伴侣状况对年轻宫颈癌 I 期患者治疗模式的影响。
我们在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定了 1988 年至 2007 年间诊断为宫颈癌 I 期的 6586 名年龄在 15 至 39 岁的女性队列。
在我们的队列中,93%(n=5080)的白人女性接受了手术,86.5%(n=985)的非白人女性接受了手术作为主要治疗方法。多变量分析显示,FIGO(国际妇产科联合会)分期较高(IA2 比值比 [OR] 3.09 [P=0.01];IB OR,21.41 [P<0.001])、丧偶/单身(OR,1.39;P=0.02)、鳞状组织学(OR,1.69;P<0.001)、诊断于 1993-1997 年期间(OR,1.69;P<0.001)和非白人种族(OR,1.95;P≤0.001)更有可能接受 RT 作为主要治疗方法。在接受手术的患者中,15.45%的白人女性与非白人女性(P<0.001)中 20.4%的患者存在高危疾病,而接受辅助 RT 的白人女性占 66%,而非白人女性占 71%(P=0.136)。多变量分析显示,种族和婚姻状况并不是接受辅助 RT 的显著预测因素。总生存的预测因素包括 RT 作为主要治疗方法(危险比 [HR],1.89;P<0.001)和非白人种族(HR,1.6;P=0.001)。婚姻状况不是总生存的显著预测因素。对于接受手术作为主要治疗方法的女性,种族是生存的显著预测因素(非白人 HR,1.93;P<0.001)。
非白人比白人更有可能接受 RT 作为主要治疗方法。这表明,非白人女性可能面临社会/文化障碍,影响她们的治疗决策,或者更有可能患有其他合并症,限制了她们的手术选择。