Bucchi Lauro, Costa Silvano, Mancini Silvia, Baldacchini Flavia, Giuliani Orietta, Ravaioli Alessandra, Vattiato Rosa, Zamagni Federica, Giorgi Rossi Paolo, Campari Cinzia, Canuti Debora, Sassoli de Bianchi Priscilla, Ferretti Stefano, Falcini Fabio
Emilia-Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute (IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori), 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Department of Gynaecology, Madre Fortunata Toniolo Hospital, 40141 Bologna, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 22;14(9):2093. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092093.
(1) Background: This population-based study aimed at identifying the factors associated with the likelihood of detection of stage IA cervical carcinoma-versus the detection of stage IB through IV cervical carcinoma-and the patterns of surgical treatment. (2) Methods: Between 1995-2016, 3750 patients living in the Emilia-Romagna Region (northern Italy) were registered with cervical carcinoma, including 2942 eligible patients (median age, 53). Multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression models. (3) Results: The likelihood of stage IA cervical carcinoma ( = 876, 29.8%) did not change over time, decreased with increasing patient age, and was lower for patients with adenocarcinoma and grade 3-4 disease. Three hundred and fifty (40.0%) patients had a conservative treatment, 317 (36.2%) had hysterectomy, 197 (22.5%) had hysterectomy with lymph node dissection (LND), and 12 (1.4%) had a conservative treatment with LND. The proportion of hysterectomy decreased from 70.6% in 1995-1999 to 46.9% in 2011-2016. The likelihood of hysterectomy increased above the age of 40. Among screening-aged (25-64 years) patients, the likelihood of hysterectomy did not differ between screen-detected and non-screen-detected ones. Hysterectomy was increasingly combined with LND. High tumour grade was the strongest determinant of LND during hysterectomy. (4) Conclusions: This study provided a multifaceted overview of stage IA cervical carcinoma over the last decades.
(1) 背景:这项基于人群的研究旨在确定与IA期宫颈癌(相对于IB期至IV期宫颈癌)检测可能性相关的因素以及手术治疗模式。(2) 方法:1995年至2016年期间,居住在意大利北部艾米利亚 - 罗马涅地区的3750例患者被登记为宫颈癌患者,其中2942例符合条件(中位年龄53岁)。使用二元逻辑回归模型进行多变量分析。(3) 结果:IA期宫颈癌的可能性(n = 876,29.8%)未随时间变化,随患者年龄增加而降低,腺癌和3 - 4级疾病患者的可能性较低。350例(40.0%)患者接受了保守治疗,317例(36.2%)接受了子宫切除术,197例(22.5%)接受了子宫切除加淋巴结清扫术(LND),12例(1.4%)接受了保守治疗加LND。子宫切除术的比例从1995 - 1999年的70.6%降至2011 - 2016年的46.9%。子宫切除术的可能性在40岁以上增加。在筛查年龄(25 - 64岁)的患者中,筛查发现和未筛查发现的患者子宫切除术的可能性没有差异。子宫切除术越来越多地与LND联合进行。高肿瘤分级是子宫切除术中LND的最强决定因素。(4) 结论:本研究提供了过去几十年IA期宫颈癌的多方面概述。