Kirton V, Wilkinson D S
Department of Environmental Dermatology, Amersham General Hospital, Buckinghamshire, Great Britain.
Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1(2):77-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05331.x.
The authors carried out further studies to assess the significance of the findings of patients sensitive to cinnamic aldehyde in a toothpaste. Selected groups of patients in whom sensitivity to this might have been overlooked were patch-tested. With the exception of three patients, two with cosmetic sensitivity and one with hand eczema, the results were negative. The frequency of use of the original toothpaste was assessed among patients attending the clinic and this was followed by a circular letter to general practitioners and dentists inviting referral of patients with oral symptoms. As a result, five further cases, four of whom gave positive patch test reactions to cinnamic aldehyde, were discovered. The authors emphasize the importance of attempting to obtain accurate information as quickly as possible when 'new' or hitherto unsuspected allergens are implicated.
作者开展了进一步研究,以评估牙膏中对肉桂醛敏感患者的研究结果的意义。对可能被忽视这种敏感性的特定患者群体进行了斑贴试验。除了三名患者(两名患有化妆品敏感性,一名患有手部湿疹)外,结果均为阴性。对前来诊所就诊的患者评估了原牙膏的使用频率,随后向全科医生和牙医发出通知函,邀请他们转诊有口腔症状的患者。结果又发现了五例病例,其中四例对肉桂醛的斑贴试验反应呈阳性。作者强调,当涉及“新的”或此前未被怀疑的过敏原时,尽快获取准确信息的重要性。