Wongpakaran Tinakon, Wongpakaran Nahathai
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Dec;95(12):1583-92.
Explore how therapist's interpersonal and attachment styles have an impact upon both the therapeutic alliance formed and therapy outcomes.
One hundred twenty one outpatients attending for routine psychiatric services were monitored for symptom outcomes, comprising depression, anxiety, and interpersonal problems. Patients were also asked about the level of therapeutic alliance that had been formed, covering goals, tasks, and the bond developed, using the working alliance inventory (WAI). At the same time, the participating therapists reported upon their interpersonal styles by categorizing them into domineering or submissive styles using the IIP-32 questionnaire and their attachment styles by categorizing them into secure or preoccupied styles using the ECR-R. To explore therapist factors such as interpersonal and attachment styles, as well as to establish the presence of gender matching, the working alliance was used as a dependent variable.
Multivariate analysis revealed that neither the gender of the therapist nor the gender of the patient, or the therapists' styles, had an effect on the Working alliance or working outcomes. The multivariate test for WAI-goal (Wilks' Lambda F (3, 134) = 4.24, p = 0.007), interpersonal style (Wilks 'Lambda F (3, 134) = 2.77, p = 0.044), attachment style (Wilks' LambdaF (3, 134) = 2. 76, p = 0.045) and IIP-Style*Attachment Style (Wilks' Lambda F (3, 134) = 3.13, p = 0.028) produced statistically significant results, while working alliance-goal was the only predictor of the level of anxiety and depression in patients (p = 0.014 and p = 0.002, respectively). Submissive style was positively correlated to anxiety (p = 0.011) and interpersonal difficulties (p = 0.006), whilst surprisingly, a secure attachment style was found to have a positive correlation with anxiety and depression. However when both styles were combined, the resulting style negatively predicted anxiety (p = 0.002).
Therapist factors were found to have no effect on working alliance, as reported by the patients; however, it was reported that when the therapists employed a secure or submissive attachment style, this played a role in helping to reduce symptoms. The working alliance-goal element was found to be a predictor of a reduction in levels of both anxiety and depression among patients.
探究治疗师的人际风格和依恋风格如何对所形成的治疗联盟及治疗效果产生影响。
对121名接受常规精神科服务的门诊患者的症状结果进行监测,这些症状包括抑郁、焦虑和人际问题。使用工作联盟量表(WAI),询问患者所形成的治疗联盟水平,涵盖目标、任务以及所建立的联系。同时,参与的治疗师通过使用IIP - 32问卷将其人际风格分类为主导型或顺从型,以及通过使用ECR - R将其依恋风格分类为安全型或专注型来报告他们的风格。为了探究治疗师的人际和依恋风格等因素,以及确定性别匹配情况,将工作联盟用作因变量。
多变量分析显示,治疗师的性别、患者的性别或治疗师的风格均对工作联盟或治疗结果没有影响。对WAI - 目标的多变量检验(威尔克斯λF(3, 134) = 4.24,p = 0.007)、人际风格(威尔克斯λF(3, 134) = 2.77,p = 0.044)、依恋风格(威尔克斯λF(3, 134) = 2.76,p = 0.045)以及IIP - 风格*依恋风格(威尔克斯λF(3, 134) = 3.13,p = 0.028)产生了具有统计学意义的结果,而工作联盟 - 目标是患者焦虑和抑郁水平的唯一预测指标(分别为p = 0.014和p = 0.002)。顺从型风格与焦虑(p = 0.011)和人际困难(p = 0.006)呈正相关,而令人惊讶的是,安全型依恋风格与焦虑和抑郁呈正相关。然而,当两种风格结合时,所产生的风格对焦虑具有负向预测作用(p = 0.002)。
如患者所报告的那样,发现治疗师因素对工作联盟没有影响;然而,据报告,当治疗师采用安全型或顺从型依恋风格时,这在帮助减轻症状方面发挥了作用。发现工作联盟 - 目标因素是患者焦虑和抑郁水平降低的一个预测指标。