• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Microsimulation of private health insurance and medicaid take-up following the U.S. Supreme court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act.美国最高法院维持《平价医疗法案》后,对私人医疗保险和医疗补助参保情况进行微观模拟。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 2):826-49. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12036. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
2
How does expansion of public health insurance affect risk pools and premiums in the market for private health insurance? Evidence from Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces.公共医疗保险的扩张如何影响私人医疗保险市场的风险池和保费?来自医疗补助和平价医疗法案市场的证据。
Health Econ. 2018 Dec;27(12):1877-1903. doi: 10.1002/hec.3809. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
AFTER COURT. Will Supreme Court ruling impact insurance pricing, Medicaid expansion?
Hosp Health Netw. 2015 Jul;89(7):16.
4
The ACA Medicaid Expansion Waiver in the Keystone State: Do the Medically Uninsured "Got a Friend in Pennsylvania"?宾夕法尼亚州的《平价医疗法案》医疗补助扩展豁免:未参保的病人在宾夕法尼亚州有“朋友”吗?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Jun;40(3):599-611. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2888579. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
ACOG Committee opinion no. 552: benefits to women of Medicaid expansion through the Affordable Care Act.ACOG 委员会意见第 552 号:平价医疗法案下医疗补助扩大对妇女的益处。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):223-5. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000425664.05729.2c.
6
You Can't Make Me Do It, but I Could Be Persuaded: A Federalism Perspective on the Affordable Care Act.你无法强迫我这么做,但我可能会被说服:从联邦制视角看《平价医疗法案》
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Apr;40(2):281-323. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2882219. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
For states that opt out of Medicaid expansion: 3.6 million fewer insured and $8.4 billion less in federal payments.对于选择不扩大医疗补助计划的州:保险人数将减少 360 万,联邦支付额将减少 84 亿美元。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jun;32(6):1030-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1019.
8
In the wake of the verdict: the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health law leaves lawmakers working out what it means for their states.裁决之后:美国最高法院对联邦医疗保健法的裁决让立法者们琢磨这对他们的州意味着什么。
State Legis. 2012 Jul-Aug;38(7):46-7.
9
Affordable Care Act litigation: the Supreme Court and the future of health care reform.《平价医疗法案》诉讼:最高法院与医疗保健改革的未来
JAMA. 2012 Jan 25;307(4):369-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.16.
10
Supreme Court review of the Affordable Care Act: the future of health care reform and practice of gastroenterology.美国最高法院对平价医疗法案的审查:医疗改革的未来和胃肠病学实践。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Jul;57(7):1735-41. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2280-7. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The potential impact of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion on reducing colorectal cancer screening disparities in African American males.平价医疗法案和医疗补助扩展计划对减少非裔美国男性结直肠癌筛查差异的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0226942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226942. eCollection 2020.
2
The demand for health care workers post-ACA.《平价医疗法案》实施后对医护人员的需求。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar;15(1):139-151. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9168-y.
3
Wage Growth for the Health Care Workforce: Projecting the Affordable Care Act Impact.医疗保健劳动力的工资增长:预测《平价医疗法案》的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;52(2):741-762. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12497. Epub 2016 May 3.
4
An early look at rates of uninsured safety net clinic visits after the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后未参保人群就诊安全网诊所比例的早期观察。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):10-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1741.

本文引用的文献

1
Health savings accounts: early estimates of national take-up.健康储蓄账户:全国参保率的早期估计
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Nov-Dec;24(6):1582-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1582.
2
Employee choice of consumer-driven health insurance in a multiplan, multiproduct setting.在多计划、多产品环境下员工对消费者驱动型医疗保险的选择。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1091-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00275.x.
3
Individual versus job-based health insurance: weighing the pros and cons.个人医疗保险与基于工作的医疗保险:权衡利弊
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Nov-Dec;18(6):28-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.6.28.
4
Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.一种以人群为导向的门诊护理病例组合测量方法的开发与应用。
Med Care. 1991 May;29(5):452-72. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199105000-00006.

美国最高法院维持《平价医疗法案》后,对私人医疗保险和医疗补助参保情况进行微观模拟。

Microsimulation of private health insurance and medicaid take-up following the U.S. Supreme court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act.

机构信息

Medical Industry Leadership Institute, University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management, Department of Finance, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 2):826-49. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12036. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12036
PMID:23398372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3626326/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To predict take-up of private health insurance and Medicaid following the U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

DATA SOURCES

Data came from three large employers and a sampling of premiums from ehealthinsurance.com. We supplemented the employer data with information on state Medicaid eligibility and costs from the Kaiser Family Foundation. National predictions were based on the MEPS Household Component.

STUDY DESIGN

We estimated a conditional logit model of health plan choice in the large group market. Using the coefficients from the choice model, we predicted take-up in the group and individual health insurance markets. Following ACA implementation, we added choices to the individual market corresponding to plans that will be available in state and federal exchanges. Depending on eligibility for premium subsidies, we reduced the out-of-pocket premiums for those choices. We simulated several possible patterns for states opting out of the Medicaid expansion, as allowed by the Supreme Court.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The ACA will increase coverage substantially in the private insurance market and Medicaid. HSAs will remain desirable in both the individual and employer markets.

CONCLUSIONS

If states opt out of the Medicaid expansion, this could increase the federal cost of health reform, while reducing the number of newly covered lives.

摘要

目的

预测美国最高法院维持平价医疗法案(ACA)后私人医疗保险和医疗补助(Medicaid)的参保率。

数据来源

数据来自三家大型雇主和 ehealthinsurance.com 的保费抽样。我们利用 Kaiser Family Foundation 提供的关于州医疗补助资格和费用的信息,补充了雇主数据。全国预测基于 MEPS 家庭组成部分。

研究设计

我们在大型团体市场中估计了健康计划选择的条件逻辑模型。利用选择模型的系数,我们预测了团体和个人医疗保险市场的参保率。ACA 实施后,我们在个人市场中增加了符合州和联邦交易所提供的计划的选择。根据获得保费补贴的资格,我们降低了这些选择的自付保费。我们模拟了最高法院允许的几种州退出医疗补助扩大范围的模式。

主要发现

ACA 将大幅增加私人保险市场和医疗补助的参保率。在个人和雇主市场中,HSA 仍将受到欢迎。

结论

如果各州选择不扩大医疗补助范围,这可能会增加医改的联邦成本,同时减少新覆盖的参保人数。