Suppr超能文献

在多计划、多产品环境下员工对消费者驱动型医疗保险的选择。

Employee choice of consumer-driven health insurance in a multiplan, multiproduct setting.

作者信息

Parente Stephen T, Feldman Roger, Christianson Jon B

机构信息

Carlson School of Management, Department of Healthcare Management, University of Minnesota, 321 19th Avenue South, Suite 3-149, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1091-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00275.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine who chooses a Consumer-Driven Health Plan (CDHP) in a multiplan, multiproduct setting, and, specifically, whether the CDHP attracts the sicker employees in a company's risk pool.

STUDY DESIGN

We estimated a health plan choice equation for employees of the University of Minnesota, who had a choice in 2002 of a CDHP and three other health plans--a traditional health maintenance organization (HMO), a preferred provider organization (PPO), and a tiered network product based on care systems. Data from an employee survey were matched to information from the university's payroll system.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Chronic illness of the employee or family members had no effect on choice of the CDHP, but such employees tended to choose the PPO. The employee's age was not related to CDHP choice. Higher-income employees chose the CDHP, as well as those who preferred health plans with a national provider panel that includes their physician in the panel. Employees tended to choose plans with lower out-of-pocket premiums, and surprisingly, employees with a chronic health condition themselves or in their family were more price-sensitive.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first evidence on who chooses a CDHP in a multiplan, multiproduct setting. The CDHP was not chosen disproportionately by the young and healthy, but it did attract the wealthy and those who found the availability of providers more appealing. Low out-of-pocket premiums are important features of health plans and in this setting, low premiums appeal to those who are less healthy.

摘要

目的

确定在多种保险计划、多种产品的环境中,哪些人会选择消费者主导型健康计划(CDHP),具体而言,CDHP是否会吸引公司风险池中病情较重的员工。

研究设计

我们估算了明尼苏达大学员工的健康计划选择方程,这些员工在2002年可以在CDHP和其他三种健康计划中进行选择——传统健康维护组织(HMO)、优选医疗机构组织(PPO)以及基于护理系统的分层网络产品。员工调查数据与大学薪资系统中的信息进行了匹配。

主要发现

员工或其家庭成员的慢性病对CDHP的选择没有影响,但这类员工倾向于选择PPO。员工的年龄与CDHP的选择无关。高收入员工选择了CDHP,以及那些更喜欢其全国供应商名单中包含自己医生的健康计划的员工。员工倾向于选择自付保费较低的计划,令人惊讶的是,自身或其家庭成员患有慢性健康问题的员工对价格更为敏感。

结论

本研究首次提供了在多种保险计划、多种产品环境中,哪些人会选择CDHP的证据。CDHP并非被年轻健康的人过度选择,但它确实吸引了富人和那些认为供应商的可获得性更具吸引力的人。低自付保费是健康计划的重要特征,在这种情况下,低保费对健康状况较差的人有吸引力。

相似文献

3
Consumer experiences in a consumer-driven health plan.消费者驱动型健康计划中的消费者体验。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1123-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00278.x.
7
Commentary--Current MSA theory: well-meaning but futile.评论——当前的多系统萎缩理论:善意却徒劳无功。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1119-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00277.x.

引用本文的文献

3
Taking the hassle out of wellness: Do peers and health matter?消除健康方面的麻烦:同伴和健康重要吗?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Mar;18(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9221-0. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Employee choice of a high-deductible health plan across multiple employers.员工在多个雇主之间选择高免赔额健康计划。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):138-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01167.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
9
Health savings accounts and health care spending.健康储蓄账户与医疗支出。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):1041-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01124.x. Epub 2010 May 28.

本文引用的文献

3
Changing health insurance trends.不断变化的医疗保险趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 19;347(12):956-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr022143.
4
Large employers' new strategies in health care.大型雇主在医疗保健方面的新策略。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 19;347(12):939-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb012850.
6
Defined-contribution health insurance products: development and prospects.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jan-Feb;21(1):49-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.1.49.
10
Are defined contributions a new direction for employer-sponsored coverage?
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2000 Oct(32):1-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验