• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜或 CT 结肠成像的知情决策。

Informed decision-making in colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy or CT-colonography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.004
PMID:23399437
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the level of informed decision making in a randomized controlled trial comparing colonoscopy and CT-colonography for colorectal cancer screening.

METHODS

8844 citizens aged 50-75 were randomly invited to colonoscopy (n=5924) or CT-colonography (n=2920) screening. All invitees received an information leaflet. Screenees received a questionnaire within 4 weeks before the planned examination, non-screenees 4 weeks after the invitation. A decision was categorized as informed when characterized by sufficient decision-relevant knowledge and consistent with personal attitudes toward participation in screening.

RESULTS

Knowledge and attitude items were completed by 1032/1276 colonoscopy screenees (81%), by 698/4648 colonoscopy non-screenees (15%), by 824/982 CT-colonography screenees (84%) and by 192/1938 CT-colonography non-screenees (10%). 1027 colonoscopy screenees (>99%) and 815 CT-colonography screenees (99%) had adequate knowledge; 915 (89%) and 742 (90%) had a positive attitude. 675 non-screenees invited to colonoscopy (97%) and 182 invited to CT-colonography (95%) had adequate knowledge; 344 (49%) and 94 (49%) expressed a negative attitude.

CONCLUSION

A large majority of screenees made an informed decision on participation. Almost half of responding non-screenees, made an uninformed decision, suggesting additional barriers to participation.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Efforts to understand the additional barriers will create opportunities to facilitate informed participation to colorectal cancer screening.

摘要

目的

评估一项比较结肠镜检查与 CT 结肠成像用于结直肠癌筛查的随机对照试验中知情决策的水平。

方法

8844 名 50-75 岁的公民被随机邀请接受结肠镜检查(n=5924)或 CT 结肠成像(n=2920)筛查。所有受邀者均收到一份信息传单。筛检者在计划检查前 4 周内收到一份问卷,非筛检者在邀请后 4 周内收到一份问卷。当决策具有足够的决策相关知识且与个人对筛查参与的态度一致时,则将其归类为知情决策。

结果

结肠镜检查筛检者中有 1032/1276 人(81%)、结肠镜检查非筛检者中有 698/4648 人(15%)、CT 结肠成像筛检者中有 824/982 人(84%)和 CT 结肠成像非筛检者中有 192/1938 人(10%)完成了知识和态度项目。1027 名结肠镜检查筛检者(>99%)和 815 名 CT 结肠成像筛检者(99%)具有足够的知识;915 名(89%)和 742 名(90%)具有积极的态度。675 名未接受结肠镜检查邀请的非筛检者(97%)和 182 名接受 CT 结肠成像邀请的非筛检者(95%)具有足够的知识;344 名(49%)和 94 名(49%)表达了消极态度。

结论

绝大多数筛检者对参与做出了知情决策。近一半做出无信息决策的回应非筛检者,表明参与存在额外障碍。

实践意义

努力了解额外的障碍将为促进结直肠癌筛查的知情参与创造机会。

相似文献

1
Informed decision-making in colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy or CT-colonography.结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜或 CT 结肠成像的知情决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
2
Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.结肠镜检查与非泻药 CT 结肠成像在结直肠癌筛查计划中的负担比较:随机对照试验。
Gut. 2012 Nov;61(11):1552-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301308. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
3
Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜与非肠道准备 CT 结肠成像的参与率和检出率:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70283-2. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
4
Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.在无症状的平均风险人群中通过结肠镜检查或计算机断层结肠成像进行基于社区的筛查。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30253.x.
5
Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.研究方案:结肠镜或 CT 结肠成像筛查结直肠癌的人群:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 May 19;10:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-47.
6
Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial of colonoscopy and CT colonography.参与和不参与结直肠癌筛查的原因:结肠镜检查和 CT 结肠成像的随机试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1777-83. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.140.
7
Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.结直肠癌:基于参与率和成本的结肠镜检查与 CT 结肠成像筛查的成本效益比较。
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):901-911. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162359. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis.结直肠癌筛查技术的偏好与参与意愿:多标准决策分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0051-z.
9
Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,结肠镜检查或计算机断层结肠成像用于结直肠癌筛查的时间要求和健康影响。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(3):182-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326080. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.计算机断层结肠成像与结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效益
CMAJ. 2005 Oct 11;173(8):877-81. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050553.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
2
Comparison of the participation rate between CT colonography and colonoscopy in screening population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.CT 结肠成像与结肠镜检查在筛查人群中的参与率比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Jan;93(1105):20190240. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190240. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Participation in faecal immunochemical testing-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in the northwest of Europe.
参与欧洲西北部基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目。
J Med Screen. 2020 Jun;27(2):68-76. doi: 10.1177/0969141319879712. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Why are the public so positive about colorectal cancer screening?公众为何对结直肠癌筛查如此积极?
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 30;18(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6106-1.
5
Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study.在一般实践候诊室中使用健康教育材料的效果:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;68(677):e869-e876. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699773. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?荷兰公众对结直肠癌筛查计划持积极态度,但这是一个明智的观点吗?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):1208. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7.
8
Common methods of measuring 'informed choice' in screening participation: Challenges and future directions.衡量筛查参与中“知情选择”的常用方法:挑战与未来方向。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Oct 28;4:601-607. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.017. eCollection 2016 Dec.
9
Patient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.结直肠癌筛查的患者决策辅助工具:系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):779-791. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.计算机断层结肠成像的临床指征:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)和欧洲胃肠道与腹部放射学会(ESGAR)指南
Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):331-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3435-z.