• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A protocol for advanced psychometric assessment of surveys.一项针对调查问卷的高级心理测量评估方案。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:156782. doi: 10.1155/2013/156782. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
2
Advancing the argument for validity of the Alberta Context Tool with healthcare aides in residential long-term care.推进阿尔伯塔省情境工具在住宅长期护理中医疗助手的有效性论证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jul 18;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-107.
3
Validation of the conceptual research utilization scale: an application of the standards for educational and psychological testing in healthcare.验证概念研究利用量表:医疗保健中教育和心理测试标准的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 19;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-107.
4
Improving the utility of multisource feedback for medical consultants in a tertiary hospital: a study of the psychometric properties of a survey tool.提高三级医院医学顾问多源反馈的效用:一项关于调查工具心理测量特性的研究
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):717-723. doi: 10.1071/AH17219.
5
Translation, culture adaption and psychometric testing of the MISSCARE Survey-Swedish version.MISSCARE调查问卷瑞典语版本的翻译、文化调适及心理测量测试
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4645-4652. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15505. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Validating the Alberta Context Tool in a multi-site Australian Emergency Department nurse population.验证阿尔伯塔省情境工具在多地点澳大利亚急诊部护士人群中的有效性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 9;14(4):e0215153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215153. eCollection 2019.
7
A Student Assessment Tool for Standardized Patient Simulations (SAT-SPS): Psychometric analysis.标准化患者模拟学生评估工具(SAT-SPS):心理测量学分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
8
Validation of the Australian Nursing Standards Assessment Tool (ANSAT): A pilot study.澳大利亚护理标准评估工具(ANSAT)的验证:一项试点研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
9
Development and psychometric testing of Holistic Clinical Assessment Tool (HCAT) for undergraduate nursing students.本科护生整体临床评估工具(HCAT)的开发与心理测量测试
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0768-0.
10
The Development and Psychometric Testing on Psychiatric Nurses of a Nurse Case Management Competence Scale in Taiwan.台湾地区精神科护理人员个案管理能力量表的编制与心理计量学测试。
J Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;26(2):72-79. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000230.

引用本文的文献

1
Burnout Among Nursing Home Care Aides and the Effects on Resident Outcomes.养老院护理助手的倦怠及其对居民结果的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):233-244. doi: 10.1177/10775587231220072. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
2
Cross-cultural validity of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire in the quality of life survey after pulmonary embolism: A Persian-speaking cohort.肺栓塞生活质量问卷在肺栓塞后生活质量调查中的跨文化效度:一个说波斯语的队列研究
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Apr 1;7(3):100145. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100145. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Psychometric evaluation and invariance of the Spanish version of the Block Fat Screener (BFS-E) in university students.大学生中西班牙语版身体脂肪筛查量表(BFS-E)的心理测量学评估及不变性
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 27;14:1055468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1055468. eCollection 2023.
4
Spanish Translation and Validation of the COVID Stress Scales in Peru.秘鲁COVID应激量表的西班牙语翻译与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:840302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840302. eCollection 2022.
5
Cross-cultural validation of the new version of the in twelve Latin American countries.新版本在十二个拉丁美洲国家的跨文化验证。 (你提供的原文“the new version of the ”后面似乎缺少具体内容)
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 19:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02563-0.
6
Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention.检查 INFORM 试验中的忠实度:一项复杂的基于团队的行为干预。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 16;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01039-2.
7
Development and psychometric testing of the 5Senses screening tool for long-term care: a study protocol.5Senses 筛查工具用于长期护理的开发和心理计量学测试:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e027720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027720.
8
Factor Structure, Reliability and Measurement Invariance of the Alberta Context Tool and the Conceptual Research Utilization Scale, for German Residential Long Term Care.适用于德国长期护理机构的阿尔伯塔情境工具和概念性研究利用量表的因子结构、信度及测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 7;7:1339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01339. eCollection 2016.
9
Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives.告知亲属量表(IRI)的编制:评估索引患者在向亲属披露遗传性癌症风险信息方面的知识、动机和自我效能感。
Int J Behav Med. 2015 Aug;22(4):551-60. doi: 10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x.
10
A systematic review of instruments to assess organizational readiness for knowledge translation in health care.对评估医疗保健领域知识转化的组织准备度的工具进行的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e114338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114338. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing the argument for validity of the Alberta Context Tool with healthcare aides in residential long-term care.推进阿尔伯塔省情境工具在住宅长期护理中医疗助手的有效性论证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jul 18;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-107.
2
The development and testing of the nursing teamwork survey.护理团队合作调查的开发与测试。
Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3bd42.
3
Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool.阿尔伯塔语境工具的开发与评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 15;9:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-234.
4
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.服务组织中的创新扩散:系统综述与建议
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
5
The PARIHS framework--a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice.PARIHS框架——一个指导循证实践实施的框架。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):297-304. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002.
6
Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study.医疗保健组织内部创新的决定因素:文献综述与德尔菲研究
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):107-23. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh030.
7
Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework.推动循证实践的实施:一个概念框架
Qual Health Care. 1998 Sep;7(3):149-58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.3.149.

一项针对调查问卷的高级心理测量评估方案。

A protocol for advanced psychometric assessment of surveys.

作者信息

Squires Janet E, Hayduk Leslie, Hutchinson Alison M, Cranley Lisa A, Gierl Mark, Cummings Greta G, Norton Peter G, Estabrooks Carole A

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8L6 ; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8M5.

出版信息

Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:156782. doi: 10.1155/2013/156782. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1155/2013/156782
PMID:23401759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3562582/
Abstract

Background and Purpose. In this paper, we present a protocol for advanced psychometric assessments of surveys based on the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. We use the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) as an exemplar survey to which this protocol can be applied. Methods. Data mapping, acceptability, reliability, and validity are addressed. Acceptability is assessed with missing data frequencies and the time required to complete the survey. Reliability is assessed with internal consistency coefficients and information functions. A unitary approach to validity consisting of accumulating evidence based on instrument content, response processes, internal structure, and relations to other variables is taken. We also address assessing performance of survey data when aggregated to higher levels (e.g., nursing unit). Discussion. In this paper we present a protocol for advanced psychometric assessment of survey data using the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) as an exemplar survey; application of the protocol to the ACT survey is underway. Psychometric assessment of any survey is essential to obtaining reliable and valid research findings. This protocol can be adapted for use with any nursing survey.

摘要

背景与目的。在本文中,我们提出了一项基于《教育和心理测验标准》对调查问卷进行高级心理测量评估的方案。我们使用艾伯塔情境工具(ACT)作为可应用此方案的示例调查问卷。方法。涉及数据映射、可接受性、信度和效度。可接受性通过缺失数据频率和完成调查问卷所需时间来评估。信度通过内部一致性系数和信息函数来评估。采用一种统一的效度方法,即基于工具内容、应答过程、内部结构以及与其他变量的关系积累证据。我们还探讨了将调查数据汇总到更高层次(如护理单元)时对其性能的评估。讨论。在本文中,我们提出了一项以艾伯塔情境工具(ACT)为例对调查数据进行高级心理测量评估的方案;该方案在ACT调查问卷中的应用正在进行。对任何调查问卷进行心理测量评估对于获得可靠且有效的研究结果至关重要。此方案可适用于任何护理调查问卷。