• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

投资一个手术结果审计系统。

Investing in a surgical outcomes auditing system.

作者信息

Bermudez Luis, Trost Kristen, Ayala Ruben

机构信息

Research and Outcomes Department, Operation Smile, Inc., Norfolk, VA 23509, USA.

出版信息

Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:671786. doi: 10.1155/2013/671786. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1155/2013/671786
PMID:23401763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3562677/
Abstract

Background. Humanitarian surgical organizations consider both quantity of patients receiving care and quality of the care provided as a measure of success. However, organizational efficacy is often judged by the percent of resources spent towards direct intervention/surgery, which may discourage investment in an outcomes monitoring system. Operation Smile's established Global Standards of Care mandate minimum patient followup and quality of care. Purpose. To determine whether investment of resources in an outcomes monitoring system is necessary and effectively measures success. Methods. This paper analyzes the quantity and completeness of data collected over the past four years and compares it against changes in personnel and resources assigned to the program. Operation Smile began investing in multiple resources to obtain the missing data necessary to potentially implement a global Surgical Outcomes Auditing System. Existing personnel resources were restructured to focus on postoperative program implementation, data acquisition and compilation, and training materials used to educate local foundation and international employees. Results. An increase in the number of postoperative forms and amount of data being submitted to headquarters occurred. Conclusions. Humanitarian surgical organizations would benefit from investment in a surgical outcomes monitoring system in order to demonstrate success and to ameliorate quality of care.

摘要

背景。人道主义外科组织将接受治疗的患者数量和所提供治疗的质量都视为成功的衡量标准。然而,组织效能通常由用于直接干预/手术的资源百分比来评判,这可能会阻碍对结果监测系统的投资。“微笑行动”既定的全球护理标准规定了患者的最低随访要求和护理质量。目的。确定对结果监测系统进行资源投资是否必要以及能否有效衡量成功。方法。本文分析了过去四年收集的数据的数量和完整性,并将其与分配给该项目的人员和资源的变化进行比较。“微笑行动”开始投入多种资源以获取潜在实施全球外科手术结果审计系统所需的缺失数据。现有人力资源进行了重组,以专注于术后项目实施、数据采集与汇编,以及用于培训当地基金会和国际员工的培训材料。结果。提交给总部的术后表格数量和数据量有所增加。结论。人道主义外科组织将从对外科手术结果监测系统的投资中受益,以便证明成功并改善护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/e7ce2759b222/PSI2013-671786.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/e26796e0add8/PSI2013-671786.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/63ade718b11d/PSI2013-671786.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/cece1d8a083d/PSI2013-671786.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/d9731bd05763/PSI2013-671786.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/cee05093ea44/PSI2013-671786.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/e7ce2759b222/PSI2013-671786.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/e26796e0add8/PSI2013-671786.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/63ade718b11d/PSI2013-671786.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/cece1d8a083d/PSI2013-671786.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/d9731bd05763/PSI2013-671786.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/cee05093ea44/PSI2013-671786.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d5/3562677/e7ce2759b222/PSI2013-671786.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Investing in a surgical outcomes auditing system.投资一个手术结果审计系统。
Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:671786. doi: 10.1155/2013/671786. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Surgical outcomes auditing systems in humanitarian organizations.人道主义组织中的手术结果审核系统。
World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):403-10. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0253-6.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
5
A Sustainable and Scalable Approach to the Provision of Cleft Care: A Focus on Safety and Quality.可持续且可扩展的唇腭裂护理提供方法:关注安全性和质量。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Aug;142(2):463-469. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004580.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
Implementation of surgical quality improvement: auditing tool for surgical site infection prevention practices.手术质量改进的实施:手术部位感染预防措施的审核工具
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000259.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Rates, Barriers, and Facilitators of Outcome Collection on Hand Surgery Outreach to Low- and Middle-Income Countries.手外科在中低收入国家开展服务的结果采集的比例、障碍和促进因素。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jul;18(5):875-884. doi: 10.1177/15589447211072200. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
2
Validation of the Unilateral Cleft Lip Severity Index for Surgeons and Laypersons.针对外科医生和非专业人士的单侧唇裂严重程度指数的验证
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 13;5(9):e1479. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001479. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons.

本文引用的文献

1
Operation smile: how to measure its success.
Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Sep;67(3):205-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318212f1b7.
2
Surgical outcomes auditing systems in humanitarian organizations.人道主义组织中的手术结果审核系统。
World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):403-10. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0253-6.
3
Discharge practices, readmission, and serious medical complications following primary cleft lip repair in 23 U.S. children's hospitals.美国23家儿童医院唇裂一期修复术后的出院流程、再入院情况及严重医疗并发症
一种针对外科医生和非专业人士的单侧唇裂手术效果评估量表的验证
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 13;5(9):e1472. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
Charitable platforms in global surgery: a systematic review of their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role training.全球外科领域的慈善平台:对其有效性、成本效益、可持续性及角色培训的系统评价
World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):10-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2516-0.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 May;123(5):1553-1559. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a0746e.
4
Immediate postoperative evaluation of the surgical wound and nutritional evolution after cheiloplasty.唇裂修复术后手术伤口及营养状况的即刻术后评估。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jul;42(4):434-8. doi: 10.1597/02-086.1.
5
The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance.欧洲腭裂研究:唇腭裂患者治疗结果的多中心研究。第2部分:颅面形态和鼻唇外观。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jan;42(1):69-77. doi: 10.1597/02-119.2.1.
6
Incidence of cleft palate fistula: an institutional experience with two-stage palatal repair.腭裂瘘的发生率:两阶段腭裂修复术的机构经验
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1515-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00011.
7
Asymmetry of left versus right unilateral cleft impairments: an experimental study of face perception.单侧唇裂左右侧损害的不对称性:面部感知的实验研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999 Nov;36(6):527-32. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1999_036_0527_aolvru_2.3.co_2.
8
Fistula formation and repair after palatal closure: an institutional perspective.腭裂修复术后的瘘管形成与修复:机构视角
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 May;99(6):1535-8.
9
Asymmetries of the upper lip and nose in noncleft and postsurgical unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals.非腭裂及唇腭裂术后单侧唇腭裂患者的上唇与鼻的不对称性
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Jul;33(4):306-11. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0306_aotula_2.3.co_2.
10
A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry. Results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities.
Br J Plast Surg. 1987 Jul;40(4):371-6. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90040-3.