Suppr超能文献

人工和自然屏障对大型非洲食肉动物的影响比较:对种间关系和连通性的影响。

Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large African carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity.

机构信息

Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, Zurich University, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zürich, CH-8057, Switzerland; Botswana Predator Conservation Trust, Private Bag 13, Maun, Botswana.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2013 May;82(3):707-15. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12039. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

Abstract
  1. Physical barriers contribute to habitat fragmentation, influence species distribution and ranging behaviour, and impact long-term population viability. Barrier permeability varies among species and can potentially impact the competitive balance within animal communities by differentially affecting co-occurring species. The influence of barriers on the spatial distribution of species within whole communities has nonetheless received little attention. 2. During a 4-year period, we studied the influence of a fence and rivers, two landscape features that potentially act as barriers on space use and ranging behaviour of lions Panthera leo, spotted hyenas Crocuta crocuta, African wild dogs Lycaon pictus and cheetahs Acinonyx jubatus in Northern Botswana. We compared the tendencies of these species to cross the barriers using data generated from GPS-radio collars fitted to a total of 35 individuals. Barrier permeability was inferred by calculating the number of times animals crossed a barrier vs. the number of times they did not cross. Finally, based on our results, we produced a map of connectivity for the broader landscape system. 3. Permeability varied significantly between fence and rivers and among species. The fence represented an obstacle for lions (permeability = 7.2%), while it was considerably more permeable for hyenas (35.6%) and wild dogs and cheetahs (≥ 50%). In contrast, the rivers and associated floodplains were relatively permeable to lions (14.4%) while they represented a nearly impassable obstacle for the other species (<2%). 4. The aversion of lions to cross the fence resulted in a relatively lion-free habitat patch on one side of the fence, which might provide a potential refuge for other species. For instance, the competitively inferior wild dogs used this refuge significantly more intensively than the side of the fence with a high presence of lions. 5. We showed that the influence of a barrier on the distribution of animals could potentially result in a broad-scale modification of community structure and ecology within a guild of co-occurring species. As habitat fragmentation increases, understanding the impact of barriers on species distributions is thus essential for the implementation of landscape-scale management strategies, the development and maintenance of corridors and the enhancement of connectivity.
摘要
  1. 物理障碍物导致栖息地破碎化,影响物种分布和活动范围,并影响长期种群生存能力。障碍物的渗透性因物种而异,通过对共存物种产生不同的影响,有可能对动物群落的竞争平衡产生影响。然而,障碍物对整个群落中物种空间分布的影响却很少受到关注。

  2. 在 4 年的时间里,我们研究了围栏和河流这两种潜在障碍物对博茨瓦纳北部狮子( Panthera leo )、斑鬣狗( Crocuta crocuta )、非洲野犬( Lycaon pictus )和猎豹( Acinonyx jubatus )的空间利用和活动范围行为的影响。我们比较了这些物种通过 GPS 无线电项圈收集的数据,这些数据是由 35 只个体的活动范围行为生成的,这些数据表明了它们穿越障碍物的倾向。障碍物的渗透性是通过计算动物穿越障碍物的次数与不穿越障碍物的次数之比来推断的。最后,根据我们的结果,我们制作了一个更广泛的景观系统的连通性地图。

  3. 围栏和河流以及不同物种之间的渗透性差异显著。围栏对狮子来说是一个障碍(渗透性=7.2%),而对鬣狗(35.6%)和野犬和猎豹(≥50%)来说,它的渗透性要大得多。相比之下,河流及其相关洪泛区对狮子来说相对容易通过(14.4%),而对其他物种来说几乎是无法逾越的障碍(<2%)。

  4. 狮子不愿意穿越围栏,导致围栏一侧形成一个相对没有狮子的栖息地斑块,这可能为其他物种提供一个潜在的避难所。例如,竞争能力较弱的野犬比狮子活动频繁的围栏一侧更频繁地使用这个避难所。

  5. 我们表明,障碍物对动物分布的影响可能会导致共存物种群落结构和生态学的广泛改变。随着栖息地破碎化的增加,了解障碍物对物种分布的影响对于实施景观尺度的管理策略、开发和维护走廊以及增强连通性至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验