Suppr超能文献

与开放修复相比,使用开窗分支型覆膜支架进行血管腔内修复可改善复杂主动脉瘤的30天预后。

Endovascular repair with fenestrated-branched stent grafts improves 30-day outcomes for complex aortic aneurysms compared with open repair.

作者信息

Tsilimparis Nikolaos, Perez Sebastian, Dayama Anand, Ricotta Joseph J

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;27(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.05.022. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair is associated with better 30-day outcomes than open surgical repair for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms. In patients with complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs) requiring suprarenal or supravisceral aortic cross-clamping during open repair, few data exist directly comparing the real-world outcomes of open repair versus endovascular repair with fenestrated-branched stent grafts (FEVAR).

METHODS

Outcomes for patients who underwent elective CAA repair using open repair and FEVAR between 2005 and 2010 were analyzed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. CAA was defined as aneurysm of the aorta involving the visceral and/or renal arteries.

RESULTS

This study compared 1091 patients who underwent open repair (group A: male, 71.5%; age, 71 ± 9 years) with 264 patients treated with FEVAR (group B: male, 82.2%; age, 74 ± 9 years). The 2 groups did not significantly differ with respect to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA III/IV: A, 93%; B, 95%, P = 0.6), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (A: 21%; B: 22%; P = 0.7), prior cardiac surgery (A: 24%; B: 20%; P = 0.19), or preoperative renal function (glomerular filtration rate: A: 69 ± 2; B: 70 ± 27; P = 0.535). Group A had significantly higher risk of any complication (A: 42%; B: 19%; P < 0.001), nonsurgical complications (A: 30%; B: 8%; P < 0.001), pulmonary complications (A: 21%; B: 2%; P < 0.001), renal complications (A: 10%; B: 1.5%; P = 0.001), and any cardiovascular complication (A: 8%; B: 2%; P < 0.001). The composite end point of surgical site infections/graft failure/bleeding transfusions were also higher in group A (A: 22%; B: 15%; P = 0.014). Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower for FEVAR (A: 5.4%; B: 0.8%; P = 0.001), as was total length of hospital stay (A: 11 ± 10 days; B: 4 ± 5 days; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide real-world database suggests that in similar patient populations, repair of CAAs with FEVAR is associated with reduced 30-day morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. Although long-term comparative studies are needed, FEVAR may represent a preferred treatment alternative to open repair for patients with CAAs.

摘要

背景

对于肾下腹主动脉瘤患者,血管内修复术与开放手术修复相比,30天预后更好。对于在开放修复过程中需要进行肾上或内脏上主动脉交叉钳夹的复杂主动脉瘤(CAA)患者,直接比较开放修复与带开窗分支支架移植物(FEVAR)血管内修复实际预后的数据很少。

方法

使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库分析了2005年至2010年间接受择期CAA修复的开放修复和FEVAR患者的预后。CAA定义为累及内脏和/或肾动脉的主动脉瘤。

结果

本研究将1091例行开放修复的患者(A组:男性,71.5%;年龄,71±9岁)与264例接受FEVAR治疗的患者(B组:男性,82.2%;年龄,74±9岁)进行了比较。两组在麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级(ASA III/IV:A组,93%;B组,95%,P = 0.6)、严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(A组:21%;B组:22%;P = 0.7)、既往心脏手术史(A组:24%;B组:20%;P = 0.19)或术前肾功能(肾小球滤过率:A组:69±2;B组:70±27;P = 0.535)方面无显著差异。A组发生任何并发症(A组:42%;B组:19%;P < 0.001)、非手术并发症(A组:30%;B组:8%;P < 0.001)、肺部并发症(A组:21%;B组:2%;P < 0.001)、肾脏并发症(A组:10%;B组:1.5%;P = 0.001)和任何心血管并发症(A组:8%;B组:2%;P < 0.001)的风险显著更高。A组手术部位感染/移植物失败/输血的复合终点也更高(A组:22%;B组:15%;P = 0.014)。FEVAR的30天死亡率显著更低(A组:5.4%;B组:0.8%;P = 0.001),住院总时长也是如此(A组:11±10天;B组:4±5天;P < 0.001)。

结论

这个全国性的实际数据库表明,在相似的患者群体中,与开放修复相比,FEVAR修复CAA与30天发病率和死亡率降低相关。尽管需要长期的比较研究,但对于CAA患者,FEVAR可能是开放修复的首选治疗替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验