Aass N, Fosså S D, Ous S, Lien H H, Stenwig A E, Paus E, Kaalhus O
Department of Medical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo.
Br J Urol. 1990 Apr;65(4):385-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14762.x.
We present 8 years' experience of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND) in 190 patients with low stage non-seminoma; 154 patients had clinical stage I (CSI) and 36 had clinical stage IIa (CSIIa) disease. Of the 154 patients with CSI tumours, 33 had increased serum AFP and/or HCG before RLND (CSIM+) and 121 had normal tumour markers (CSIM-). Retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (pathological stage II) (PSII) were found in 38 of 121 patients with CSIM-, in 19 of 33 patients with CSIIM+ and in 26 of 36 patients with CSIIa. In a multivariate analysis, the presence of small vessel infiltration (demonstrated in histological sections of the primary tumour) and a prolonged tumour marker half-life were predictive factors for PSII. These 2 factors enabled a group of non-seminoma patients with CSI disease to be identified who had a 15% risk of retroperitoneal tumour growth (low risk group) as compared with a high risk group where 60 to 70% of patients had retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. Relapses occurred in 7 of 107 patients with PSI and in 6 of 83 patients with PSII disease; in the latter group, 5 relapses developed before the start of routine adjuvant chemotherapy; 6% of patients developed major post-operative complications. In addition, "dry ejaculation" was the principal side effect following RLND (unilateral RLND: 20/132 patients; bilateral RLND: 50/54 patients). The comparative cost to the health service during the first year of follow-up was estimated for low risk non-seminoma patients with CSI subjected to RLND and for those in whom a surveillance policy was adopted. The latter approach was preferable. It was concluded that a surveillance policy should be followed in low risk non-seminoma CSI patients provided that frequent follow-up is possible. A more active policy is recommended in high risk patients (e.g. adjuvant chemotherapy without RLND). Nerve-sparing RLND may be considered in patients with CSIIa disease and negative tumour markers.
我们介绍了对190例低分期非精原细胞瘤患者进行原发性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RLND)的8年经验;154例患者为临床I期(CSI),36例为临床IIa期(CSIIa)疾病。在154例CSI肿瘤患者中,33例在RLND前血清AFP和/或HCG升高(CSIM +),121例肿瘤标志物正常(CSIM -)。121例CSIM -患者中有38例发现腹膜后淋巴结转移(病理II期)(PSII),33例CSIIM +患者中有19例,36例CSIIa患者中有26例。多因素分析显示,小血管浸润(在原发肿瘤组织切片中证实)和肿瘤标志物半衰期延长是PSII的预测因素。这两个因素使得一组CSI疾病的非精原细胞瘤患者得以被识别,其腹膜后肿瘤生长风险为15%(低风险组),而高风险组中60%至70%的患者有腹膜后淋巴结转移。107例PSI患者中有7例复发,83例PSII疾病患者中有6例复发;在后一组中,5例复发发生在常规辅助化疗开始前;6%的患者出现严重术后并发症。此外,“干性射精”是RLND后的主要副作用(单侧RLND:20/132例患者;双侧RLND:50/54例患者)。估计了对接受RLND的低风险CSI非精原细胞瘤患者以及采取监测策略的患者在随访第一年的医疗服务相对成本。后一种方法更可取。得出的结论是,对于低风险CSI非精原细胞瘤患者,如果能够进行频繁随访,则应遵循监测策略。对于高风险患者(如不进行RLND的辅助化疗),建议采取更积极的策略。对于CSIIa疾病且肿瘤标志物阴性的患者,可考虑保留神经的RLND。