• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医源性气管和喉狭窄的法律责任确定。

Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis.

机构信息

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 07103, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1754-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23997. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1002/lary.23997
PMID:23404544
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Laryngotracheal stenosis usually occurs as a result of injury from endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy placement. With an estimated incidence of 1% to 22% after these procedures, chronic sequelae ranging from discomfort to devastating effects on quality of life, and even death, make this complication a potential litigation target. We examined federal and state court records for malpractice regarding laryngotracheal stenosis and examined characteristics influencing determination of liability.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

METHODS

The Westlaw Next legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was searched for pertinent federal and state malpractice cases and examined for several factors including alleged cause of malpractice, complications, case outcome, and specialty of the defendants.

RESULTS

Twenty-three pertinent cases over 35 years were identified. Fourteen (60.9%) cases were decided in the physician's favor, with six plaintiff verdicts awarding an average of $922,129 for malpractice, and three out-of-court settlements averaging $441,600. Hospitals were the most frequently named defendants, and anesthesiologists were most commonly named physician defendants. Endotracheal intubations and tracheostomy history were frequent factors in these cases. Laryngeal lesions were more likely to result in payments, trending higher than those stemming from tracheal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple cases mentioned previous intubation as a potential risk factor that may have led to laryngotracheal stenosis. Location of stenosis and requirement of reparative procedures may also influence outcomes. Cases not decided in the defendant's favor frequently included other extenuating circumstances, including severity of other injuries. Although the majority of cases were defendant decisions, the verdicts decided for the plaintiffs had considerable damages awarded.

摘要

目的/假设:喉气管狭窄通常是由于气管插管或气管切开术引起的损伤。这些手术后的慢性后遗症范围从不适到对生活质量的严重影响,甚至死亡,这种并发症使潜在的法律诉讼成为可能。我们检查了联邦和州法院记录,以了解有关喉气管狭窄的医疗事故,并研究了影响责任确定的特征。

研究设计

回顾性分析。

方法

Westlaw Next 法律数据库(汤森路透,纽约,NY)被搜索了相关的联邦和州医疗事故案件,并检查了几个因素,包括医疗事故的指控原因、并发症、案件结果和被告的专业。

结果

在过去 35 年中,确定了 23 个相关案例。14 例(60.9%)案件的判决对医生有利,6 例原告判决的医疗事故赔偿平均为 922129 美元,3 例庭外和解的平均赔偿为 441600 美元。医院是最常被点名的被告,麻醉师是最常被点名的医生被告。气管插管和气管切开术史是这些病例中的常见因素。喉损伤比气管损伤更有可能导致支付,趋势更高。

结论

多个案例提到先前的插管是可能导致喉气管狭窄的潜在风险因素。狭窄的位置和修复程序的要求也可能影响结果。对被告不利的案件通常包括其他加重情况,包括其他伤害的严重程度。尽管大多数案件的判决对被告有利,但判决有利于原告的案件赔偿金额相当可观。

相似文献

1
Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis.医源性气管和喉狭窄的法律责任确定。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1754-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23997. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
2
Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.医源性眼眶损伤的法律责任。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2099-103. doi: 10.1002/lary.24000. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Characterizing liability for cranial nerve injuries: a detailed analysis of 209 malpractice trials.描述颅神经损伤的责任:209 起医疗事故审判的详细分析。
Laryngoscope. 2013 May;123(5):1156-62. doi: 10.1002/lary.23995. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation.医源性脑脊液漏诉讼中的医师责任
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Sep;3(9):722-5. doi: 10.1002/alr.21169. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
5
Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective.脑膜炎与法律责任:耳鼻喉科视角
Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
6
A tough pill to swallow: Medicolegal liability and dysphagia.难以下咽的苦果:法医学责任与吞咽困难
Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Nov-Dec;39(6):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
Lasers and losers in the eyes of the law: liability for head and neck procedures.法律视角下的激光与失败者:头颈部手术的责任
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):277-83. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.21.
8
Malodorous consequences: what comprises negligence in anosmia litigation?恶臭后果:嗅觉减退诉讼中的过失包括哪些?
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Mar;4(3):216-22. doi: 10.1002/alr.21257. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
Medicolegal Aspects of Iatrogenic Dysphonia and Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury.医源性发声障碍和喉返神经损伤的法医学问题
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;154(1):80-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599815607220. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
10
From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures.从手术室到法庭:全面描述与面部整形手术相关的诉讼案件。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Aug;123(8):1849-53. doi: 10.1002/lary.23905. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Medico-legal liability of injuries arising from laryngoscopy.喉内镜检查所致损伤的医事法律责任。
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 May;138(5):554-558. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001986. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
Protecting the Airway and the Physician: Lessons from 214 Cases of Endotracheal Intubation Litigation.保护气道与医生:214例气管插管诉讼案的经验教训
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 18;2022:8209644. doi: 10.1155/2022/8209644. eCollection 2022.
3
Altitude-Related Change in Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Helicopter EMS.直升机紧急医疗服务中气管导管套囊压力与海拔相关的变化
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):624-629. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.32078. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Intubation trauma and the head and neck surgeon: issues with a shared airway.气管插管创伤与头颈外科医生:共享气道问题
J R Soc Med. 2015 Nov;108(11):426-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076815614803.
5
Esophageal perforation and rupture: a comprehensive medicolegal examination of 59 jury verdicts and settlements.食管穿孔和破裂:59 项陪审团裁决和和解的全面医学法律审查。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Oct;17(10):1732-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2261-y.