Suppr超能文献

医源性气管和喉狭窄的法律责任确定。

Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis.

机构信息

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 07103, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1754-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23997. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Laryngotracheal stenosis usually occurs as a result of injury from endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy placement. With an estimated incidence of 1% to 22% after these procedures, chronic sequelae ranging from discomfort to devastating effects on quality of life, and even death, make this complication a potential litigation target. We examined federal and state court records for malpractice regarding laryngotracheal stenosis and examined characteristics influencing determination of liability.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

METHODS

The Westlaw Next legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was searched for pertinent federal and state malpractice cases and examined for several factors including alleged cause of malpractice, complications, case outcome, and specialty of the defendants.

RESULTS

Twenty-three pertinent cases over 35 years were identified. Fourteen (60.9%) cases were decided in the physician's favor, with six plaintiff verdicts awarding an average of $922,129 for malpractice, and three out-of-court settlements averaging $441,600. Hospitals were the most frequently named defendants, and anesthesiologists were most commonly named physician defendants. Endotracheal intubations and tracheostomy history were frequent factors in these cases. Laryngeal lesions were more likely to result in payments, trending higher than those stemming from tracheal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple cases mentioned previous intubation as a potential risk factor that may have led to laryngotracheal stenosis. Location of stenosis and requirement of reparative procedures may also influence outcomes. Cases not decided in the defendant's favor frequently included other extenuating circumstances, including severity of other injuries. Although the majority of cases were defendant decisions, the verdicts decided for the plaintiffs had considerable damages awarded.

摘要

目的/假设:喉气管狭窄通常是由于气管插管或气管切开术引起的损伤。这些手术后的慢性后遗症范围从不适到对生活质量的严重影响,甚至死亡,这种并发症使潜在的法律诉讼成为可能。我们检查了联邦和州法院记录,以了解有关喉气管狭窄的医疗事故,并研究了影响责任确定的特征。

研究设计

回顾性分析。

方法

Westlaw Next 法律数据库(汤森路透,纽约,NY)被搜索了相关的联邦和州医疗事故案件,并检查了几个因素,包括医疗事故的指控原因、并发症、案件结果和被告的专业。

结果

在过去 35 年中,确定了 23 个相关案例。14 例(60.9%)案件的判决对医生有利,6 例原告判决的医疗事故赔偿平均为 922129 美元,3 例庭外和解的平均赔偿为 441600 美元。医院是最常被点名的被告,麻醉师是最常被点名的医生被告。气管插管和气管切开术史是这些病例中的常见因素。喉损伤比气管损伤更有可能导致支付,趋势更高。

结论

多个案例提到先前的插管是可能导致喉气管狭窄的潜在风险因素。狭窄的位置和修复程序的要求也可能影响结果。对被告不利的案件通常包括其他加重情况,包括其他伤害的严重程度。尽管大多数案件的判决对被告有利,但判决有利于原告的案件赔偿金额相当可观。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验