• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医源性眼眶损伤的法律责任。

Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2099-103. doi: 10.1002/lary.24000. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1002/lary.24000
PMID:23404575
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In this study, we detailed factors governing legal outcomes in iatrogenic orbital injury, with the purpose of discussing strategies to minimize liability and enhance patient safety.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Jury verdict and settlement reports were searched from publically available federal and state court records using the Westlaw database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY). After exclusion of nonrelevant cases, 20 cases of iatrogenic orbital injuries were examined for factors such as legal outcome, damages awarded, defendant specialty, alleged causes of malpractice, and patient demographic information.

RESULTS

The majority (60.0%) of cases were resolved in the defendant's favor. Payment was considerable for the cases decided in support of the plaintiff, averaging $1.13 million. Out-of-court settlements averaged $1.78 million (range, $487,500-$3.9 million), whereas jury-awarded damages averaged $472,661 (range, $75,000-$763,214). Complications stemming from endoscopic sinus surgery were most common (50.0%). Diplopia was the most common medical complaint (50.0%), whereas permanent deficits and having to undergo additional surgery were each present in 65.0% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for permanent sequelae of iatrogenic orbital injury makes this complication susceptible to malpractice litigation. Otolaryngologists were the most common defendants. Although cases were resolved in the defendant's favor 60% of the time, payments made were considerable, averaging $1.13 million. Steps to minimize liability and improve patient safety include an informed consent process explicitly listing risks, including diplopia and blindness, and obtaining timely ophthalmology consultation when a complication is recognized.

摘要

目的/假设:本研究详细阐述了医源性眼眶损伤相关法律后果的决定因素,旨在讨论降低责任风险和提高患者安全性的策略。

研究设计

回顾性分析。

方法

使用 Westlaw 数据库(Thomson Reuters,纽约,NY)从公开的联邦和州法院记录中搜索陪审团裁决和和解报告。排除不相关的病例后,对 20 例医源性眼眶损伤病例进行了研究,分析了法律结果、判给的损害赔偿金、被告专业、医疗事故的疑似原因以及患者人口统计学信息等因素。

结果

大多数(60.0%)案件对被告有利。支持原告的案件的赔偿金额较大,平均为 113 万美元。庭外和解平均为 178 万美元(范围,48.75 万美元至 390 万美元),而陪审团判给的损害赔偿金平均为 47.2661 万美元(范围,7.5 万美元至 76.3214 万美元)。内窥镜鼻窦手术引起的并发症最常见(50.0%)。复视是最常见的医疗投诉(50.0%),而永久性损伤和需要接受额外手术的情况在 65.0%的病例中出现。

结论

医源性眼眶损伤的永久性后遗症使这种并发症容易发生医疗事故诉讼。耳鼻喉科医生是最常见的被告。尽管 60%的案件以被告胜诉的方式解决,但支付的款项金额可观,平均为 113 万美元。降低责任风险和提高患者安全性的措施包括明确列出风险的知情同意程序,包括复视和失明,并在出现并发症时及时获得眼科咨询。

相似文献

1
Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.医源性眼眶损伤的法律责任。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2099-103. doi: 10.1002/lary.24000. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
2
Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation.医源性脑脊液漏诉讼中的医师责任
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Sep;3(9):722-5. doi: 10.1002/alr.21169. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
3
Characterizing liability for cranial nerve injuries: a detailed analysis of 209 malpractice trials.描述颅神经损伤的责任:209 起医疗事故审判的详细分析。
Laryngoscope. 2013 May;123(5):1156-62. doi: 10.1002/lary.23995. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis.医源性气管和喉狭窄的法律责任确定。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1754-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23997. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
5
Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective.脑膜炎与法律责任:耳鼻喉科视角
Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
6
Malodorous consequences: what comprises negligence in anosmia litigation?恶臭后果:嗅觉减退诉讼中的过失包括哪些?
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Mar;4(3):216-22. doi: 10.1002/alr.21257. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
7
Lasers and losers in the eyes of the law: liability for head and neck procedures.法律视角下的激光与失败者:头颈部手术的责任
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):277-83. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.21.
8
Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery.鼻内镜鼻窦手术中损伤的法医学分析
Laryngoscope. 2004 Aug;114(8):1492-5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00032.
9
Unattractive consequences: litigation from facial dermabrasion and chemical peels.不良后果:面部磨皮术和化学换肤术引发的诉讼。
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Nov;34(8):1244-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14547948. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
10
Sleep surgery and medical malpractice.睡眠手术与医疗事故。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):E250-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.24559. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Medicolegal Challenges of Facial Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.面部整形手术的法医学挑战:一项系统综述
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Aug 18;45(9):973-984. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf082.
2
Protecting the Airway and the Physician: Lessons from 214 Cases of Endotracheal Intubation Litigation.保护气道与医生:214例气管插管诉讼案的经验教训
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 18;2022:8209644. doi: 10.1155/2022/8209644. eCollection 2022.
3
A National WestlawNext Database Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Radiation Oncology.对放射肿瘤学医疗事故诉讼的威科先行国家数据库分析。
Fed Pract. 2018 Feb;35(Suppl 1):S44-S52.
4
Litigation Following Carpal Tunnel Release.腕管松解术后的诉讼
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):466-470. doi: 10.1177/1558944718760032. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
5
Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 cases.揭示阑尾切除术的医疗事故:234 例回顾。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Oct;17(10):1796-803. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2248-8. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Esophageal perforation and rupture: a comprehensive medicolegal examination of 59 jury verdicts and settlements.食管穿孔和破裂:59 项陪审团裁决和和解的全面医学法律审查。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Oct;17(10):1732-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2261-y.