• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医源性脑脊液漏诉讼中的医师责任

Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Sep;3(9):722-5. doi: 10.1002/alr.21169. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1002/alr.21169
PMID:23536469
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The potentially severe complications resulting from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak makes iatrogenic injury a medicolegal area of concern for otolaryngologists and neurosurgeons. The objectives of this analysis were to study legal outcomes as well as medical and nonmedical elements affecting malpractice litigation.

METHODS

Public court records available in the Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) were searched for medical malpractice litigation related to iatrogenic CSF leak. Of the 18 jury verdicts and settlements included, outcomes and awards, patient demographic data, and other factors instrumental in determining legal responsibility were recorded for comparison.

RESULTS

Ten (55.6%) cases were resolved in the defendant's favor, 2 (11.1%) resulted in damages awarded by a jury, and 6 (33.3%) were settled out of court before resolution of trial. Mean damages awarded were $1.1 million, while out of court settlements averaged $966,887. Malpractice stemming from patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery comprised 77.8% of cases analyzed. The most frequent alleged factors cited for litigation included having to undergo additional surgery (88.9%), developing meningitis (50.0%), and failing to recognize complications in a timely manner (44.4%). Perceived deficits in informed consent were alleged in one-third of cases.

CONCLUSION

Although a slight majority of cases were resolved in the defendant's favor, payments made were considerable, averaging approximately $1 million. Strategies to decrease liability and allow patients to make more informed decisions should include clear communication with patients that explicitly states potential risks, such as meningitis, and possible need to undergo additional reparative surgery.

摘要

背景

由于脑脊液(CSF)漏导致的潜在严重并发症,使医源性损伤成为耳鼻喉科医生和神经外科医生关注的法律问题。本分析的目的是研究法律结果以及影响医疗事故诉讼的医疗和非医疗因素。

方法

在 Westlaw 法律数据库(Thomson Reuters,纽约,NY)中搜索与医源性 CSF 漏相关的医疗事故诉讼的公开法庭记录。在包括的 18 项陪审团裁决和和解中,记录了结果和裁决、患者人口统计学数据以及其他对确定法律责任有影响的因素,以便进行比较。

结果

10 例(55.6%)以被告胜诉结案,2 例(11.1%)由陪审团判给损害赔偿金,6 例(33.3%)在审判前庭外和解。判给的平均赔偿金为 110 万美元,而庭外和解的平均金额为 966,887 美元。分析的病例中,内镜鼻窦手术引起的医疗事故占 77.8%。诉讼中最常被指控的因素包括不得不进行额外的手术(88.9%)、患脑膜炎(50.0%)以及未能及时发现并发症(44.4%)。三分之一的案件被指控在知情同意方面存在缺陷。

结论

尽管略占多数的案件以被告胜诉结案,但支付的款项相当可观,平均约为 100 万美元。减少责任和允许患者做出更明智决策的策略应包括与患者明确沟通,明确说明潜在风险,如脑膜炎和可能需要进行额外的修复手术。

相似文献

1
Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation.医源性脑脊液漏诉讼中的医师责任
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Sep;3(9):722-5. doi: 10.1002/alr.21169. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
2
Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.医源性眼眶损伤的法律责任。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2099-103. doi: 10.1002/lary.24000. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Malodorous consequences: what comprises negligence in anosmia litigation?恶臭后果:嗅觉减退诉讼中的过失包括哪些?
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Mar;4(3):216-22. doi: 10.1002/alr.21257. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
4
Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective.脑膜炎与法律责任:耳鼻喉科视角
Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008.确定耳鼻喉科的法律责任:2008 年以来 44 项试验的综述。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
6
Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis.医源性气管和喉狭窄的法律责任确定。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1754-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23997. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Epistaxis: the factors involved in determining medicolegal liability.鼻出血:涉及医学法律责任的因素。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Jan;4(1):76-81. doi: 10.1002/alr.21229. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
8
Characterizing liability for cranial nerve injuries: a detailed analysis of 209 malpractice trials.描述颅神经损伤的责任:209 起医疗事故审判的详细分析。
Laryngoscope. 2013 May;123(5):1156-62. doi: 10.1002/lary.23995. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Image-guidance in endoscopic sinus surgery: is it associated with decreased medicolegal liability?内镜鼻窦手术中的图像引导:是否与减少医疗法律责任有关?
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Dec;3(12):980-5. doi: 10.1002/alr.21210. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
10
Unattractive consequences: litigation from facial dermabrasion and chemical peels.不良后果:面部磨皮术和化学换肤术引发的诉讼。
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Nov;34(8):1244-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14547948. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Medico-legal liability of injuries arising from laryngoscopy.喉内镜检查所致损伤的医事法律责任。
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 May;138(5):554-558. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001986. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
Protecting the Airway and the Physician: Lessons from 214 Cases of Endotracheal Intubation Litigation.保护气道与医生:214例气管插管诉讼案的经验教训
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 18;2022:8209644. doi: 10.1155/2022/8209644. eCollection 2022.
3
Adverse Events in Facial Implant Surgery and Associated Malpractice Litigation.面部植入手术中的不良事件及相关医疗事故诉讼
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 May 1;20(3):244-248. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.2242.
4
A Cross-sectional Analysis of Adverse Events and Litigation for Injectable Fillers.注射用填充剂不良事件和诉讼的横断面分析。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 May 1;20(3):207-214. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1888.
5
Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 cases.揭示阑尾切除术的医疗事故:234 例回顾。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Oct;17(10):1796-803. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2248-8. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Esophageal perforation and rupture: a comprehensive medicolegal examination of 59 jury verdicts and settlements.食管穿孔和破裂:59 项陪审团裁决和和解的全面医学法律审查。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Oct;17(10):1732-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2261-y.