Rantala Leena M, Hakala Suvi, Holmqvist Sofia, Sala Eeva
School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(6):278-82. doi: 10.1159/000346864. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
The aim of the study was to investigate if voice ergonomic risk factors in classrooms correlated with acoustic parameters of teachers' voice production.
The voice ergonomic risk factors in the fields of working culture, working postures and indoor air quality were assessed in 40 classrooms using the Voice Ergonomic Assessment in Work Environment - Handbook and Checklist. Teachers (32 females, 8 males) from the above-mentioned classrooms recorded text readings before and after a working day. Fundamental frequency, sound pressure level (SPL) and the slope of the spectrum (alpha ratio) were analyzed.
The higher the number of the risk factors in the classrooms, the higher SPL the teachers used and the more strained the males' voices (increased alpha ratio) were. The SPL was already higher before the working day in the teachers with higher risk than in those with lower risk.
In the working environment with many voice ergonomic risk factors, speakers increase voice loudness and use more strained voice quality (males). A practical implication of the results is that voice ergonomic assessments are needed in schools.
本研究旨在调查教室中的语音工效学风险因素是否与教师发声的声学参数相关。
使用工作环境中的语音工效学评估手册和检查表,对40间教室在工作文化、工作姿势和室内空气质量等方面的语音工效学风险因素进行评估。来自上述教室的教师(32名女性,8名男性)在工作日前后进行文本朗读录音。分析基频、声压级(SPL)和频谱斜率(阿尔法比率)。
教室中的风险因素数量越多,教师使用的声压级越高,男性声音越紧张(阿尔法比率增加)。在工作日之前,高风险教师的声压级就已经比低风险教师的更高。
在存在许多语音工效学风险因素的工作环境中,说话者会提高音量并使用更紧张的音质(男性)。该结果的实际意义在于学校需要进行语音工效学评估。