Department of Public Health, Population Medicine Unit, Catholic University ‘Sacro Cuore’, Largo F. Vito, n.1, Rome, Italy.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Sep;25(4):381-93. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt020. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
To measure the relative efficiency of primary care (PC) in turning their structures into services delivery and turning their services delivery into quality outcomes.
Cross-sectional study based on the dataset of the Primary Healthcare Activity Monitor for Europe project. Two Data Envelopment
models were run to compare the relative technical efficiency. A sensitivity analysis of the resulting efficiency scores was performed.
PC systems in 22 European countries in 2009/2010.
Model 1 included data on PC governance, workforce development and economic conditions as inputs and access, coordination, continuity and comprehensiveness of care as outputs. Model 2 included the previous process dimensions as inputs and quality indicators as outputs.
There is relatively reasonable efficiency in all countries at delivering as many as possible PC processes at a given level of PC structure. It is particularly important to invest in economic conditions to achieve an efficient structure-process balance. Only five countries have fully efficient PC systems in turning their services delivery into high quality outcomes, using a similar combination of access, continuity and comprehensiveness, although they differ on the adoption of coordination of services. There is a large variation in efficiency levels obtained by countries with inefficient PC in turning their services delivery into quality outcomes.
Maximizing the individual functions of PC without taking into account the coherence within the health-care system is not sufficient from a policymaker's point of view when aiming to achieve efficiency.
衡量初级保健(PC)将其结构转化为服务提供以及将服务提供转化为质量结果的相对效率。
基于欧洲初级医疗保健活动监测项目数据集的横断面研究。运行了两个数据包络分析模型来比较相对技术效率。对得出的效率得分进行了敏感性分析。
2009/2010 年欧洲 22 个国家的 PC 系统。
模型 1 纳入了 PC 治理、劳动力发展和经济条件作为投入,以及获得、协调、连续性和护理综合性作为产出的数据。模型 2 将之前的流程维度作为投入,将质量指标作为产出。
在所有国家,在给定的 PC 结构水平上提供尽可能多的 PC 流程都具有相对合理的效率。投资于经济条件对于实现有效的结构-流程平衡尤为重要。只有五个国家在将服务提供转化为高质量结果方面拥有完全有效的 PC 系统,尽管在服务协调方面有所不同,但都采用了类似的获取、连续性和综合性的组合。在将服务提供转化为质量结果方面效率水平较低的国家之间存在很大差异。
从决策者的角度来看,仅最大化 PC 的个别功能而不考虑医疗保健系统内部的一致性,在实现效率方面是不够的。