• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲初级保健监测:结构、过程和结果指标。

The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators.

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-11-81
PMID:20979612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2975652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scientific research has provided evidence on benefits of well developed primary care systems. The relevance of some of this research for the European situation is limited.There is currently a lack of up to date comprehensive and comparable information on variation in development of primary care, and a lack of knowledge of structures and strategies conducive to strengthening primary care in Europe. The EC funded project Primary Health Care Activity Monitor for Europe (PHAMEU) aims to fill this gap by developing a Primary Care Monitoring System (PC Monitor) for application in 31 European countries. This article describes the development of the indicators of the PC Monitor, which will make it possible to create an alternative model for holistic analyses of primary care.

METHODS

A systematic review of the primary care literature published between 2003 and July 2008 was carried out. This resulted in an overview of: (1) the dimensions of primary care and their relevance to outcomes at (primary) health system level; (2) essential features per dimension; (3) applied indicators to measure the features of primary care dimensions. The indicators were evaluated by the project team against criteria of relevance, precision, flexibility, and discriminating power. The resulting indicator set was evaluated on its suitability for Europe-wide comparison of primary care systems by a panel of primary care experts from various European countries (representing a variety of primary care systems).

RESULTS

The developed PC Monitor approaches primary care in Europe as a multidimensional concept. It describes the key dimensions of primary care systems at three levels: structure, process, and outcome level. On structure level, it includes indicators for governance, economic conditions, and workforce development. On process level, indicators describe access, comprehensiveness, continuity, and coordination of primary care services. On outcome level, indicators reflect the quality, and efficiency of primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized instrument for describing and comparing primary care systems has been developed based on scientific evidence and consensus among an international panel of experts, which will be tested to all configurations of primary care in Europe, intended for producing comparable information. Widespread use of the instrument has the potential to improve the understanding of primary care delivery in different national contexts and thus to create opportunities for better decision making.

摘要

背景

科学研究已经提供了有关完善的初级保健系统益处的证据。但是,其中一些研究对欧洲的情况相关性有限。目前,缺乏有关初级保健发展差异的最新、全面和可比的信息,也缺乏了解有利于加强欧洲初级保健的结构和战略。该 EC 资助项目“欧洲初级保健活动监测器”(PHAMEU)旨在通过开发用于 31 个欧洲国家的初级保健监测系统(PC Monitor)来填补这一空白。本文介绍了 PC Monitor 指标的开发情况,这将使我们能够创建一个用于全面分析初级保健的替代模型。

方法

对 2003 年至 2008 年 7 月期间发表的初级保健文献进行了系统回顾。这导致了以下方面的概述:(1)初级保健的各个方面及其与(初级)卫生系统水平结果的相关性;(2)每个方面的基本特征;(3)用于衡量初级保健维度特征的应用指标。项目团队根据相关性、精确性、灵活性和区分能力标准对指标进行了评估。由来自不同欧洲国家的初级保健专家组成的小组对该指标集进行了评估,以确定其在欧洲范围内比较初级保健系统的适宜性(代表各种初级保健系统)。

结果

所开发的 PC Monitor 将欧洲的初级保健视为一个多维概念。它描述了初级保健系统的主要维度,分为三个层次:结构、过程和结果水平。在结构层面上,它包括治理、经济条件和劳动力发展方面的指标。在过程层面上,指标描述了初级保健服务的可及性、全面性、连续性和协调性。在结果层面上,指标反映了初级保健的质量和效率。

结论

基于科学证据和国际专家小组的共识,已经开发出一种用于描述和比较初级保健系统的标准化工具,将对欧洲所有初级保健配置进行测试,旨在提供可比信息。该工具的广泛使用有可能提高对不同国家背景下初级保健提供情况的理解,从而为更好的决策创造机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/2975652/e4531b9fac49/1471-2296-11-81-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/2975652/1ffc42badc90/1471-2296-11-81-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/2975652/e4531b9fac49/1471-2296-11-81-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/2975652/1ffc42badc90/1471-2296-11-81-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/2975652/e4531b9fac49/1471-2296-11-81-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators.欧洲初级保健监测:结构、过程和结果指标。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary health care as the main guarantor of a healthy population in the country and a global challenge in the world: a systematic review.初级卫生保健作为该国健康人口的主要保障及全球面临的一项挑战:一项系统评价
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 10;13:38. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.141252.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevalence and predictors of sub-optimal laboratory monitoring of selected higher risk medicines in Irish general practice: a 5-year retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling older adults.爱尔兰全科医疗中特定高风险药物实验室监测未达最佳标准的患病率及预测因素:一项针对社区居住老年人的5年回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e086446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086446.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions.基层医疗的广度:对其核心维度的系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 13;10:65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-65.
2
Measuring mechanisms for quality assurance in primary care systems in transition: test of a new instrument in Slovenia and Uzbekistan.转型期初级保健系统质量保证的衡量机制:斯洛文尼亚和乌兹别克斯坦一种新工具的测试
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(3):165-77.
3
Primary care, social inequalities, and all-cause, heart disease, and cancer mortality in US counties, 1990.
Nurse management of minor problems in primary care emergencies: a non-randomized controlled trial.
初级护理急诊中轻微问题的护士管理:一项非随机对照试验。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 24;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02729-2.
4
Mapping Psychosocial Challenges, Mental Health Difficulties, and MHPSS Services for Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children in Greece: Insights from Service Providers.希腊无人陪伴寻求庇护儿童的心理社会挑战、心理健康问题及心理社会、精神、卫生与社会服务映射:服务提供者的见解
Children (Basel). 2024 Nov 23;11(12):1413. doi: 10.3390/children11121413.
5
Care providers' view of the barriers in providing care for adolescents with emotional and behavioral problems.护理提供者对为有情绪和行为问题的青少年提供护理时所面临障碍的看法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 19;15:1302004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1302004. eCollection 2024.
6
Tackling the primary healthcare workforce crisis: time to talk about health systems and governance-a comparative assessment of nine countries in the WHO European region.应对基层医疗劳动力危机:是时候谈谈卫生系统与治理了——对世卫组织欧洲区域九个国家的比较评估
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Dec 31;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00965-2.
7
Comprehensiveness in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.基层医疗中的全面性:一项范围综述
Milbank Q. 2025 Mar;103(1):153-204. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12723. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
8
Reporting study results in primary health care: the CRISP guidelines.在初级卫生保健中报告研究结果:CRISP指南。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Oct 17;25:e52. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000458.
9
Quality of primary health care for chronic diseases in low-resource settings: Evidence from a comprehensive study in rural China.资源匮乏环境下的慢性病初级卫生保健质量:来自中国农村一项综合研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0304294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304294. eCollection 2024.
10
Developing a quality and safety assessment framework for Iran's military hospitals.为伊朗军队医院制定质量和安全评估框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11248-w.
1990年美国各县的初级保健、社会不平等与全因死亡率、心脏病死亡率和癌症死亡率
Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):674-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.031716.
4
Research in family/general practice is essential for improving health globally.家庭/全科医疗研究对于全球改善健康状况至关重要。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May 26;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2-4. doi: 10.1370/afm.145.
5
Why research in family medicine? A superfluous question.为什么要进行家庭医学研究?这是个多余的问题。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May 26;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S17-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.148.
6
The need for research in primary care.初级保健研究的必要性。
Lancet. 2003 Oct 18;362(9392):1314-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14576-X.
7
The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998.1970 - 1998年经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家初级保健系统对健康结果的贡献
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):831-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00149.
8
Primary care, self-rated health, and reductions in social disparities in health.初级保健、自评健康状况与健康方面社会差距的缩小
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):529-50. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.t01-1-00036.
9
Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective.与政策相关的健康决定因素:国际视角
Health Policy. 2002 Jun;60(3):201-18. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00208-1.
10
Does general practitioner gatekeeping curb health care expenditure?全科医生守门人制度能抑制医疗保健支出吗?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):22-6. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500107.