School of Psychological Sciences & Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;48(9):1377-88. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0659-1. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
High expressed emotion (high-EE), as compared with low-EE, relatives of patients with long-term psychosis may behave in a more controlling manner towards patients. Furthermore, higher levels of behavioural control have been associated with higher relapse rates. We investigated in a recent-onset sample, the extent to which high-EE relatives engage in controlling behaviours and attribute the patient's illness to factors within patient's control. Furthermore, we examined whether criticism/hostility and emotional overinvolvement (EOI) were, respectively, associated with two types of behavioural control (termed 'direct influencing' and 'buffering'). We also investigated if controlling behaviours or attributions were better relapse predictors than EE.
Measures of EE, controllability attributions and behavioural control and its subtypes ('direct influencing' and 'buffering') were derived from Camberwell Family Interviews with 80 relatives of recent-onset psychosis patients. 'Direct influencing' attempts denote any behaviour intending to coerce the patient; while 'buffering' attempts refer to any behaviour aiming to take control or do things for the patient.
High-EE relatives perceived patients as having more control over their illness and were more inclined to attempt to control patients' behaviour than low-EE relatives. Furthermore, high-EE-critical relatives used more direct influencing attempts, and high-EE-EOI relatives used more buffering attempts, but behavioural control was not associated with relapse in this recent-onset sample.
These findings may help us to understand the development of EE in recent-onset psychosis families. Acknowledging and integrating relatives' attributional and behavioural patterns in designing and delivering clinical and familial early interventions should prove beneficial in meeting the needs of this specific population.
与低 EE 相比,高 EE(高情绪表达)患者的亲属可能对患者表现出更具控制性的行为。此外,更高水平的行为控制与更高的复发率有关。我们在近期发病的样本中研究了高 EE 亲属在多大程度上实施控制行为,并将患者的病情归因于患者可控制的因素。此外,我们还研究了批评/敌意和情感过度卷入(EOI)是否分别与两种类型的行为控制(分别称为“直接影响”和“缓冲”)相关。我们还研究了控制行为或归因是否比 EE 更能预测复发。
使用 Camberwell 家庭访谈对 80 名近期发病精神分裂症患者的亲属进行 EE、可控性归因和行为控制及其亚型(“直接影响”和“缓冲”)的测量。“直接影响”尝试表示任何旨在强迫患者的行为;而“缓冲”尝试是指任何旨在控制或为患者做事情的行为。
高 EE 亲属认为患者对自己的病情有更多的控制能力,并且比低 EE 亲属更倾向于尝试控制患者的行为。此外,高 EE-批评性亲属更多地使用直接影响尝试,高 EE-情感过度卷入亲属更多地使用缓冲尝试,但在这个近期发病的样本中,行为控制与复发无关。
这些发现可能有助于我们理解近期发病精神分裂症家庭中 EE 的发展。在设计和提供临床和家庭早期干预措施时,承认和整合亲属的归因和行为模式,应有助于满足这一特定人群的需求。