Morgenstern Richard D, Harrington Winston, Shih Jhih-Shyang, Bell Michelle L
Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., USA.
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Nov(168):5-35.
In this study, we sought to assess what portion, if any, of the reductions in ambient concentrations of particulate matter (PM*) < or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) that occurred in the United States between the years 1999 and 2006 can be attributed to reductions in emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) resulting from implementation of Phase 2 of Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. To this end, a detailed statistical model linking sources and monitors over time and space was used to estimate associations between the observed emissions reductions and improvements in air quality. Overall, it turned out to be quite feasible to use relatively transparent statistical methods to assess these outcomes of the Phase 2 program, which was designed to reduce long-range transport of emissions. Associations between changes in emissions from individual power plants and monitor-specific estimates of changes in concentrations of PM2.5, our indicator pollutant, were highly significant and were mostly of the expected relative magnitudes with respect to distances and directions from sources. Originally estimated on monthly data for a set of 193 monitors between 1999 and 2005, our preferred model performed equally well using data for the same 193 monitors for 2006 as well as for an additional 217 monitors not in the original set in 2006. Although substantial model uncertainty was observed, we were able to estimate that the Title IV Phase 2 emissions reduction program implemented between 1999 and 2005 reduced PM2.5 concentrations in the eastern United States by an average of 1.07 microg/m3 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.11 microg/m3) compared with a counterfactual case defined as there having been no change in emission rates per unit of energy input (1 million British thermal units [BTUs]). On a population-weighted basis, the comparable reduction in PM2.5 was 0.89 microg/m3. Compared with the air quality fate and transport models used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate air quality improvements associated with the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) for 2010 and 2015, when baseline PM2.5 concentrations were expected to be about one-third lower, our statistical model yielded roughly similar results per ton of SO2 reduced, well within the estimated confidence intervals of the models. We have proposed a number of steps to advance air quality outcomes research using statistical methods. Specifically, we have emphasized the value of updating our analysis with post-2005 data to try to corroborate our findings. We have also recommended extending the work on air quality outcomes to include changes in health outcomes that might be associated with the implementation of Title IV Phase 2.
在本研究中,我们试图评估1999年至2006年间美国空气动力学直径小于或等于2.5微米的颗粒物(PM₂.₅)环境浓度的降低中,有多少(如果有的话)可归因于1990年《清洁空气法修正案》第四章第二阶段实施导致的二氧化硫(SO₂)和氮氧化物(NOₓ)排放减少。为此,我们使用了一个详细的统计模型,该模型将不同时间和空间的污染源与监测器联系起来,以估计观察到的排放减少与空气质量改善之间的关联。总体而言,使用相对透明的统计方法来评估该第二阶段计划的这些成果是相当可行的,该计划旨在减少排放的远距离传输。单个发电厂排放变化与我们的指示性污染物PM₂.₅浓度变化的监测器特定估计值之间的关联非常显著,并且在距离和方向上与污染源的关系大多符合预期的相对量级。我们的首选模型最初是根据1999年至2005年期间一组193个监测器的月度数据进行估计的,使用2006年相同的193个监测器的数据以及2006年不在原始数据集中的另外217个监测器的数据时,该模型表现同样良好。尽管观察到存在相当大的模型不确定性,但我们能够估计,与假设每单位能量输入(100万英热单位[BTU])的排放率没有变化的反事实情况相比,1999年至2005年实施的第四章第二阶段减排计划使美国东部的PM₂.₅浓度平均降低了1.07微克/立方米(标准差[SD]=0.11微克/立方米)。按人口加权计算,PM₂.₅的可比降低量为0.89微克/立方米。与美国环境保护局(EPA)用于估计与2010年和2015年《清洁空气州际规则》(CAIR)相关的空气质量改善的空气质量归宿和传输模型相比,当时预计基线PM₂.₅浓度会低约三分之一,我们的统计模型每吨SO₂减排产生的结果大致相似,完全在模型估计的置信区间内。我们提出了一些步骤,以推进使用统计方法进行的空气质量结果研究。具体而言,我们强调了用2005年后的数据更新我们分析的价值,以试图证实我们的发现。我们还建议将空气质量结果的研究工作扩展到包括可能与第四章第二阶段实施相关的健康结果变化。