Hallberg I R, Norberg A, Eriksson S
Care Research and Developmental Unit, University of Lund, Sweden.
J Adv Nurs. 1990 Apr;15(4):410-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01833.x.
This study aimed at examining the relationship between the occurrence of vocally disruptive behaviour and the care of demented patients. The results presented here focus on the contents of the patient's daily life provided by the staff. In all the psychogeriatric wards within one county council, having patients identified as vocally disruptive, 37 patients exhibiting this behaviour and 37 controls were studied. Semistructured continuous observations for 15 hours per patient (7.00 a.m.-10.00 p.m.) were made. Data from a previous report revealed that the vocally disruptive patients were more physically dependent on the staff as compared to controls. However, the physical care provided did not differ significantly. The patients spent 21% of the observed time in caring activities, mainly physical care, 18% of the time they were sleeping or dozing, and 71% of the observed time they were left to themselves and reduced to inactivity and solitude. Regression analysis disclosed that only the amount of activating care in a group was significantly related to the vocally disruptive behaviour. Hence the data support the idea that understimulation is present in the demented patient's life but it can hardly be the cause of the behaviour. However, the environment might contribute to the occurrence and maintenance of vocally disruptive behaviour.
本研究旨在探讨发声干扰行为的发生与痴呆患者护理之间的关系。此处呈现的结果聚焦于工作人员所提供的患者日常生活内容。在一个郡议会辖区内的所有老年精神科病房中,选取了37名有发声干扰行为的患者以及37名对照患者进行研究。对每位患者进行了为期15小时(上午7点至晚上10点)的半结构化连续观察。先前一份报告的数据显示,与对照组相比,有发声干扰行为的患者在身体上对工作人员的依赖程度更高。然而,所提供的身体护理并无显著差异。患者在观察期间有21%的时间用于护理活动,主要是身体护理,18%的时间用于睡觉或打瞌睡,71%的观察时间里他们处于无人照料状态,变得不活动且孤独。回归分析表明,只有一组中积极护理的量与发声干扰行为显著相关。因此,数据支持这样一种观点,即痴呆患者的生活中存在刺激不足的情况,但这几乎不可能是该行为的原因。然而,环境可能促使发声干扰行为的发生和持续。