Evidence-Based Medicine Centre of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2013;29(2):156-67. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2013.768359.
Adjuvant intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IHIC) is a therapy which combines thermotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. It is theoretically powerful for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but is there evident advantage in clinical practice? We need evidence to guide our decision-making.
Meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IHIC) for patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer, and to provide the reference for clinical practice and study.
We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese databases (Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang) electronically and also retrieved papers from other sources (tracing related references and communication with other authors). All relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were collected to compare surgery combined with IHIC to surgery without IHIC for AGC. There were no language restrictions. After independent quality assessment and data extraction by two reviewers, meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1 software.
16 RCTs involving 1,906 patients were included. Compared with surgery alone, combination therapy (surgery plus IHIC) was associated with a significant improvement in survival rate at 1 year (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.21 to 4.05; p < 0.00001), 2 years (HR = 2.43; 95%CI = 1.81 to 3.26; p < 0.00001), 3 years (HR = 2.63; 95%CI = 2.17 to 3.20; p < 0.00001), 5 years (HR = 2.49; 95%CI = 1.97 to 3.14; p < 0.00001), and 9 years (HR = 2.14; 95%CI = 1.38 to 3.32; p = 0.0007). Compared with surgery alone, combination therapy was associated with a significant reduction in recurrence rate at 2 years (RR = 0.42; 95%CI = 0.29 to 0.61; p < 0.00001), 3 years (RR = 0.35; 95%CI = 0.24 to 0.51; p < 0.00001) and 5 years (RR = 0.47; 95%CI = 0.39 to 0.56; p < 0.00001). IHIC was not found to be associated with higher risks of anastomotic leakage, ileus, bowel perforation, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reaction and hypohepatia, but it increased the incidence of abdominal pain (RR = 21.46; 95%CI = 5.24 to 87.78; p < 0.00001).
Compared with surgery alone, surgery combined with IHIC can improve survival rate and reduce the recurrence rate, with acceptable safety. However, safety outcomes should be further evaluated by larger samples and high quality studies. Additionally, hyperthermia for the intraperitoneal chemotherapy needs more clinical research.
辅助术中腹腔内热化疗(IHIC)是一种将热疗和腹腔内化疗相结合的治疗方法。对于进展期胃癌(AGC)患者,理论上具有强大的作用,但在临床实践中是否具有明显优势?我们需要证据来指导我们的决策。
进行荟萃分析评估可切除局部晚期胃癌患者接受辅助术中腹腔内热化疗(IHIC)的有效性和安全性,为临床实践和研究提供参考。
我们在 Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和中文数据库(中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)和万方)中进行电子检索,并从其他来源(追踪相关参考文献和与其他作者交流)中检索文献。收集所有比较手术联合 IHIC 与单纯手术治疗 AGC 的随机对照试验(RCT)。无语言限制。两名评审员独立进行质量评估和数据提取后,使用 RevMan 5.1 软件进行荟萃分析。
纳入了 16 项 RCT,共 1906 名患者。与单纯手术相比,联合治疗(手术加 IHIC)在 1 年(风险比(HR)=2.99;95%置信区间(CI)=2.21 至 4.05;p<0.00001)、2 年(HR=2.43;95%CI=1.81 至 3.26;p<0.00001)、3 年(HR=2.63;95%CI=2.17 至 3.20;p<0.00001)、5 年(HR=2.49;95%CI=1.97 至 3.14;p<0.00001)和 9 年(HR=2.14;95%CI=1.38 至 3.32;p=0.0007)时生存率显著提高。与单纯手术相比,联合治疗在 2 年(RR=0.42;95%CI=0.29 至 0.61;p<0.00001)、3 年(RR=0.35;95%CI=0.24 至 0.51;p<0.00001)和 5 年(RR=0.47;95%CI=0.39 至 0.56;p<0.00001)时复发率显著降低。IHIC 与吻合口漏、肠梗阻、肠穿孔、骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应和低肝血症等较高风险无关,但增加了腹痛的发生率(RR=21.46;95%CI=5.24 至 87.78;p<0.00001)。
与单纯手术相比,手术联合 IHIC 可提高生存率,降低复发率,且安全性可接受。然而,需要更大样本量和高质量研究进一步评估安全性结果。此外,腹腔内化疗的热疗需要更多的临床研究。