Overman Amy A, Wiseman Kimberly D, Allison Meredith, Stephens Joseph D W
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Elon University, Elon, North Carolina 27244, USA.
Exp Aging Res. 2013;39(2):215-34. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.761914.
BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: This study investigated age-related differences in memory for crime information. Older adults have been found to rely more than young adults on schema- and stereotype-based processing in memory, and such age differences may have implications in the criminal justice system. Some prior research has examined schema-based processing among older adults in legal settings, but no studies have tested for schema effects on older adults' memory for specific details of a crime.
Older adults (N = 56, ages 65-93) and young adults (N = 52, ages 18-22) read a passage about a criminal suspect's "bad" or "good" childhood, and then read a crime report containing incriminating, exonerating, and neutral details with regard to the suspect. Participants were subsequently tested on recognition of accurate versus altered details from the crime report. Participants also rated the suspect"s guilt, and completed a battery of neuropsychological tests. Correct and false recognition rates were analyzed with ANOVA to compare means across age group, evidence type, and background type, and guilt ratings were analyzed with linear regression using neuropsychological scores as predictors.
Among older adults, an interaction was found between evidence type (incriminating/exonerating) and suspect's background (good/bad childhood) in false recognition of altered details from the crime report, supporting the hypothesis that schema-based processing influenced older adult memory from crime information. Additionally, although guilt ratings were not related to the suspect's background for either age group, they were predicted by older adults' short-delay recall (β = -.37), suggesting that cognitive decline may play a role in older adults' interpretations of evidence.
The findings suggest reduced cognitive capacity in older adults increases schema-based processing in memory for crime information, and are consistent with research in other domains that has demonstrated greater schema effects in memory with aging. The results may have implications for criminal justice, and open up possibilities for further research on how young and older adults may differ in memory for specific types of crime information.
背景/研究背景:本研究调查了犯罪信息记忆方面与年龄相关的差异。研究发现,老年人在记忆中比年轻人更多地依赖基于图式和刻板印象的加工,这种年龄差异可能对刑事司法系统产生影响。一些先前的研究考察了法律环境中老年人基于图式的加工,但没有研究测试图式对老年人对犯罪具体细节记忆的影响。
老年人(N = 56,年龄65 - 93岁)和年轻人(N = 52,年龄18 - 22岁)阅读一篇关于犯罪嫌疑人“不良”或“良好”童年的文章,然后阅读一份包含与该嫌疑人有罪、无罪及中性细节的犯罪报告。随后对参与者进行测试,以识别犯罪报告中准确与改动后的细节。参与者还对嫌疑人的有罪程度进行评分,并完成一系列神经心理学测试。使用方差分析对正确和错误识别率进行分析,以比较不同年龄组、证据类型和背景类型的均值,并使用神经心理学分数作为预测指标,通过线性回归分析有罪评分。
在老年人中,发现犯罪报告中改动细节的错误识别方面,证据类型(有罪/无罪)和嫌疑人背景(童年良好/不良)之间存在交互作用,支持了基于图式的加工影响老年人对犯罪信息记忆的假设。此外,尽管两个年龄组的有罪评分均与嫌疑人背景无关,但老年人短暂延迟回忆可预测有罪评分(β = -.37),这表明认知衰退可能在老年人对证据的解读中起作用。
研究结果表明,老年人认知能力下降会增加对犯罪信息记忆中基于图式的加工,这与其他领域的研究一致,即随着年龄增长,记忆中的图式效应更大。这些结果可能对刑事司法产生影响,并为进一步研究年轻人和老年人在特定类型犯罪信息记忆方面的差异开辟了可能性。