Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-0201, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jul;91(7):3272-82. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4287. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
Three experiments using 1,356 pigs (C22 × 336 PIC) were conducted to determine the interactive effects of dietary L-carnitine and ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) on carcass characteristics and meat quality of finishing pigs. Experiments were arranged as factorials with main effects of L-carnitine and RAC; L-carnitine levels were 0, 25, or 50 mg/kg in Exp. 1 and 2 and 0 or 50 mg/kg in Exp. 3, and RAC levels of 0, 5, or 10 mg/kg in Exp. 1 and 0 or 10 mg/kg in Exp. 2 and 3. Dietary L-carnitine was fed from 38 kg to slaughter (109 and 118 kg in Exp. 1 and 3, respectively) or for 4 wk before slaughter (109 kg in Exp. 2). Ractopamine HCl was fed for 4 wk in all experiments. Exp. 1 and 2 were conducted at university research facilities (2 pigs per pen), and Exp. 3 was conducted in a commercial research barn (23 pigs per pen). In Exp. 1, an L-carnitine × RAC interaction (P < 0.02) was observed for LM visual color, L*, and a*/b*. In pigs fed RAC, increasing L-carnitine decreased L* and increased visual color scores and a*/b* compared with pigs not fed RAC. Ultimate pH tended to increase (linear, P < 0.07) with increasing L-carnitine. Drip loss decreased (linear, P < 0.04) in pigs fed increasing L-carnitine. In Exp. 2, firmness scores decreased in pigs fed increasing L-carnitine when not fed RAC, but firmness scores increased and drip losses decreased with increasing L-carnitine when RAC was added to the diet (L-carnitine × RAC interaction, P < 0.04). Percentage lean was greater (P < 0.01) for pigs fed RAC in Exp. 2. In Exp. 3, fat thickness decreased and lean percentage increased in pigs fed L-carnitine or RAC, but the responses were not additive (L-carnitine × RAC interaction, P < 0.03). Furthermore, pigs fed L-carnitine tended (P < 0.06) to have decreased LM drip loss percentage whereas pigs fed RAC had decreased (P < 0.05) 10th rib and average backfat and decreased drip loss than pigs fed diets without RAC. These results suggest that dietary RAC increased carcass leanness and supplemental L-carnitine reduced LM drip loss when fed in combination with RAC.
三个使用 1356 头猪(C22×336 PIC)的实验旨在确定日粮左旋肉碱和盐酸莱克多巴胺(RAC)对育肥猪胴体特性和肉质的互作效应。实验设计为左旋肉碱和 RAC 的主效应的析因试验;在实验 1 和 2 中,左旋肉碱的水平为 0、25 或 50mg/kg,在实验 3 中为 0 或 50mg/kg;在实验 1 和 2 中,RAC 的水平为 0、5 或 10mg/kg,在实验 3 中为 0 或 10mg/kg。在实验 1 和 3 中,从 38kg 到屠宰(分别为 109 和 118kg)或在屠宰前 4 周(实验 2 为 109kg)喂养左旋肉碱。在所有实验中,RAC 喂养 4 周。实验 1 和 2 在大学研究设施(每栏 2 头猪)进行,实验 3 在商业研究仓(每栏 23 头猪)进行。在实验 1 中,观察到了左旋肉碱×RAC 互作(P<0.02)对 LM 视觉颜色、L和 a/b的影响。在饲喂 RAC 的猪中,与未饲喂 RAC 的猪相比,添加左旋肉碱降低了 L和视觉颜色评分,并增加了 a*/b*。最终 pH 值随着左旋肉碱浓度的增加而升高(线性,P<0.07)。在饲喂左旋肉碱的猪中,滴水损失减少(线性,P<0.04)。在实验 2 中,当未饲喂 RAC 时,随着左旋肉碱浓度的增加,猪的硬度评分降低,但当 RAC 添加到日粮中时,硬度评分增加,滴水损失减少(左旋肉碱×RAC 互作,P<0.04)。实验 2 中,饲喂 RAC 的猪的瘦肉率更高(P<0.01)。在实验 3 中,饲喂左旋肉碱或 RAC 的猪的脂肪厚度减少,瘦肉率增加,但反应不是累加的(左旋肉碱×RAC 互作,P<0.03)。此外,饲喂左旋肉碱的猪的 LM 滴水损失百分比有降低的趋势(P<0.06),而饲喂 RAC 的猪的第 10 肋骨和平均背膘厚降低,滴水损失也低于未饲喂 RAC 的猪。这些结果表明,日粮 RAC 增加了胴体的瘦肉率,而补充左旋肉碱与 RAC 结合使用可降低 LM 滴水损失。