Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Daru. 2013 Feb 22;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-21-14.
In spite of the extreme rise to the knowledge of nanotechnology in pharmaceutical sciences, there are currently limited experimental works studying the interactions between nanoparticles (NPs) and the biological system. Adjustment of size and surface area plays the main role in the reaction between NPs and cells leading to their increased entrance into cells through skin, gastrointestinal and respiratory system. Moreover, change in physicochemical reactivity of NPs causes them to interact with circulatory and cellular proteins differentially leading to the altered parameters of their biokinetics, including adsorption, distribution, translocation, transformation, and elimination. A direct relationship between the surface area, reactive oxygen species generating capability, and proinflammatory effects of NPs have been found in respiratory tract toxicity. Additionally, complement-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to liposomes and other lipid-based nanodrugs have been well defined. Inhalation studies of some NPs have confirmed the translocation of inhaled materials to extra pulmonary organs such as central nervous system (CNS) via olfactory neurons and induction of inflammatory response. Injectable uncoated NPs have a tendency to remain on the injection site while the poly ethanol glycol (PEG)-coated NPs can be notably drained from the injection site to get as far as the lymph nodes where they accumulate. This confirms the existence of channels within the extracellular matrix for NPs to move along. Furthermore, induction of DNA strand breaks and formation of micronuclei have been recorded for exposure to some NPs such as single-walled carbon nanotubes.In the recent years, most of the studies have simply outlined better efficacy of nanodrugs, but few discussed their possible toxic reactions specially if used chronically. Therefore, we emphasize that this part of the nanoscience must not be undermined and toxicologists must be sensitive to set up suitable in vivo or in vitro toxicity models. A system for collecting data about the relationships between NPs' structure-size-efficacy-toxicity (SSET) should be specified with special regard to portal of entry and target organ.
尽管人们对药物科学中的纳米技术知识有了极大的提高,但目前仍有限的实验工作研究纳米颗粒(NPs)与生物系统之间的相互作用。NPs 与细胞之间的反应主要由尺寸和表面积的调节决定,这导致它们通过皮肤、胃肠道和呼吸系统更容易进入细胞。此外,NPs 的物理化学反应性的变化导致它们与循环和细胞蛋白的相互作用不同,从而改变了它们的生物动力学参数,包括吸附、分布、转移、转化和消除。在呼吸道毒性方面,已经发现 NPs 的表面积、产生活性氧物质的能力和促炎作用之间存在直接关系。此外,已经很好地定义了脂质体和其他基于脂质的纳米药物的补体介导的超敏反应。一些 NPs 的吸入研究证实,吸入的物质通过嗅神经元转移到肺部以外的器官,如中枢神经系统(CNS),并诱导炎症反应。未涂层的可注射 NPs 倾向于留在注射部位,而聚乙二醇(PEG)涂层的 NPs 可以从注射部位明显排出,到达淋巴结,在那里它们积聚。这证实了细胞外基质中存在 NPs 移动的通道。此外,已经记录到一些 NPs(如单壁碳纳米管)暴露会导致 DNA 链断裂和形成微核。近年来,大多数研究只是简单地概述了纳米药物的更好疗效,但很少讨论它们可能的毒性反应,特别是如果长期使用。因此,我们强调,纳米科学的这一部分绝不能被忽视,毒理学家必须对建立合适的体内或体外毒性模型保持敏感。应该规定一个系统,用于收集有关 NPs 的结构-尺寸-功效-毒性(SSET)之间关系的数据,特别要考虑进入门户和靶器官。
J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2009-8
Acc Chem Res. 2012-9-17
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012
Acc Chem Res. 2019-5-6
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017-11-21
J Appl Toxicol. 2017-8-11
Int J Mol Sci. 2022-7-19
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-2-11
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020-12-16
Materials (Basel). 2020-7-9
Int J Nanomedicine. 2018-12-11
Daru. 2012-12-15
Arch Toxicol. 2012-5-11
Drug Discov Ther. 2011-10
Toxicol Sci. 2010-12-22
J Control Release. 2010-3-10
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008-5-22
Occup Med (Lond). 2006-8
Science. 2006-2-3