Department of Rehabilitation, Nijmegen Centre for Evidence Based Practice and Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gait Posture. 2013 Jun;38(2):304-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
The contribution of spasticity to postural imbalance in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the responses to support-surface perturbations in patients with hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP). These patients typically suffer from bilateral spasticity with relatively preserved muscle strength of the lower limbs. Particularly toes-up rotations were expected to be destabilizing due to insufficient suppression of calf muscle stretch reflexes.
Participants were seventeen symptomatic community-dwelling patients with autosomal dominant pure HSP and seventeen healthy controls. All patients had increased muscle tone of the triceps surae (TS) but no muscle contractures. Perturbations were applied by rotating or translating a platform with increasing intensity in four sagittal-plane directions. The primary outcome was maximum intensity ('limit of stability') sustained without stepping or grabbing in each type of perturbation. Leg muscle tone and strength were assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, respectively.
For toes-up perturbations, limits of stability in patients were substantially lower than in controls, which were related to TS muscle tone but not to tibialis anterior (TA) strength. Toes-down rotations were indiscriminative. For backward perturbations, patients also had lower limits of stability, unrelated to TA strength or TS muscle tone. In forward perturbations, patients with TS strength MRC 4 were less stable than patients with normal TS strength and controls.
Calf muscle spasticity and weakness differently contribute to postural imbalance in patients with HSP. This notion could have implications for the clinical management of spasticity.
痉挛对于上运动神经元综合征患者姿势失衡的影响仍不明确。本研究旨在评估遗传性痉挛性截瘫(HSP)患者对支撑面扰动的反应。这些患者通常表现为双侧痉挛,下肢肌肉力量相对保留。由于小腿肌肉伸展反射抑制不足,特别预期足趾上翘旋转会导致不稳定。
参与者为 17 名有症状的社区居住的常染色体显性纯合 HSP 患者和 17 名健康对照者。所有患者均有比目鱼肌(TS)肌张力增高,但无肌肉挛缩。通过以递增强度在四个矢状面方向旋转或平移平台来施加扰动。主要结局是在每种扰动类型下不跨步或不抓握而维持的最大强度(“稳定性极限”)。腿部肌张力和力量分别用改良 Ashworth 量表和医学研究委员会(MRC)量表评估。
对于足趾上翘旋转,患者的稳定性极限明显低于对照组,这与 TS 肌张力有关,但与胫骨前肌(TA)强度无关。足趾下翘旋转无差别。对于向后的扰动,患者的稳定性极限也较低,与 TA 强度或 TS 肌张力无关。在向前的扰动中,TS 肌力 MRC 4 的患者比 TS 肌力正常的患者和对照组更不稳定。
跟腱肌痉挛和无力对 HSP 患者的姿势失衡有不同的影响。这一概念可能对痉挛的临床管理有影响。