Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2013 May;21(3):175-83. doi: 10.1002/erv.2227. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for eating disorders (EDs) are problematic and due to be revised. One area of debate concerns binge eating.
We investigated the impact of four aspects of binge eating (binge size, loss of control, frequency of objective and subjective binge eating) assessed by questionnaire and interview in adult ED patients on concurrent and follow-up symptoms.
Data came from two independent naturalistic Swedish ED databases (N = 2354, with 12-month follow-up; and N = 597, with 36-month follow-up).
We found fair concurrent validity of criteria assessed using questionnaire, but poor concurrent validity for interview assessment, and no prognostic validity regardless of assessment method.
The findings give support to some planned DSM-5 revisions, but challenge the assumption of binge eating as a useful diagnostic criterion, as well as having implications for measurement.
精神障碍诊断与统计手册(DSM)中用于诊断进食障碍(ED)的标准存在问题,需要进行修订。其中一个有争议的领域是关于暴食的问题。
我们通过问卷调查和访谈的方式,研究了暴食行为的四个方面(暴食量、失控感、客观和主观暴食的频率)对成年 ED 患者的当前和随访症状的影响。
数据来自两个独立的瑞典 ED 数据库(N = 2354,随访 12 个月;N = 597,随访 36 个月)。
我们发现,问卷评估的标准具有较好的同期有效性,但访谈评估的标准同期有效性较差,且无论评估方法如何,都没有预后有效性。
这些发现为 DSM-5 的一些修订提供了支持,但也对暴食作为有用的诊断标准的假设提出了挑战,同时对评估方法也具有一定的启示意义。