• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垂直防渗墙中井径比试验的解析解释

Analytical interpretation of slug test in a vertical cutoff wall.

作者信息

Lim Jeehee, Lee Dongseop, Zlotnik Vitaly A, Choi Hangseok

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

出版信息

Ground Water. 2014 Mar-Apr;52(2):284-90. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12033. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1111/gwat.12033
PMID:23442033
Abstract

An analysis method for slug tests performed in a partially penetrating well within a vertical cutoff wall is presented. A steady-state shape factor for evaluating hydraulic conductivity of the material within the wall was derived by applying the method of images to the previously developed analytical solution of Zlotnik et al. (2010) for an infinite aquifer. Two distinct boundary conditions were considered: constant-head boundary for the case of direct contact between the wall and the aquifer, and no-flux boundary representing an impermeable filter cake on the sides of the wall. The constant-head and no-flux boundary conditions yield significantly higher and lower shape factors, respectively, than those for the infinite aquifer. Consequently the conventional line-fitting method for slug test analysis would yield an inaccurate estimate of the hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall.

摘要

本文提出了一种在垂直防渗墙内部分穿透井中进行的井柱试验分析方法。通过将镜像法应用于Zlotnik等人(2010年)先前为无限含水层开发的解析解,推导出了用于评估墙内材料水力传导率的稳态形状因子。考虑了两种不同的边界条件:墙与含水层直接接触情况下的定水头边界,以及代表墙侧面不透水滤饼的无流量边界。与无限含水层相比,定水头和无流量边界条件分别产生明显更高和更低的形状因子。因此,传统的用于井柱试验分析的线性拟合方法会对垂直防渗墙的水力传导率产生不准确的估计。

相似文献

1
Analytical interpretation of slug test in a vertical cutoff wall.垂直防渗墙中井径比试验的解析解释
Ground Water. 2014 Mar-Apr;52(2):284-90. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12033. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
2
Modification of the Bouwer and Rice method to a cutoff wall with a filter cake.将 Bouwer 和 Rice 方法修改为带有滤饼的防渗墙。
Ground Water. 2010 Nov-Dec;48(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00721.x.
3
General steady-state shape factor for a partially penetrating well.部分穿透井的稳态通用形状因子。
Ground Water. 2010 Jan-Feb;48(1):111-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00621.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
4
Slug test in confined aquifers, the over-damped case: quasi-steady flow analysis.
Ground Water. 2012 Jul-Aug;50(4):608-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00855.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
5
A Novel Semi-Analytical Solution of Over-Damped Slug Test in a Three-Layered Aquifer System.三层含水层系统中超阻尼塞流试验的新半解析解。
Ground Water. 2024 May-Jun;62(3):417-426. doi: 10.1111/gwat.13350. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
6
Numerical modeling of slug tests with MODFLOW using equivalent well blocks.
Ground Water. 2015 Jan-Feb;53(1):158-63. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12181. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.使用串联循环井在不抽取地下水的情况下测量水力传导率。
J Contam Hydrol. 2008 Sep 10;100(3-4):127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
8
Hydraulic constraints on the performance of a groundwater denitrification wall for nitrate removal from shallow groundwater.水力条件对从浅层地下水中去除硝酸盐的地下水反硝化墙性能的限制。
J Contam Hydrol. 2004 Apr;69(3-4):263-79. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00157-8.
9
Assessing lakebed hydraulic conductivity and seepage flux by potentiomanometer.利用压力计评估湖底水力传导率和渗流通量。
Ground Water. 2011 Mar-Apr;49(2):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00717.x.
10
A leaky aquifer below Champlain Sea clay: closed-form solutions for natural seepage.尚普兰海黏土下方的渗漏含水层:天然渗流的闭式解
Ground Water. 2013 Nov-Dec;51(6):960-7. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12023. Epub 2013 Feb 26.