Suppr超能文献

华法林抗凝治疗期间行射频导管消融治疗心房颤动的国际标准化比值的最佳范围。

The optimal range of international normalized ratio for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation during therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;6(2):302-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.000143. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation is associated with a lower risk of periprocedural complications than when warfarin is temporarily discontinued. However, the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) levels during RFA have not been defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective analysis, RFA was performed in 1133 consecutive patients (mean age, 61±10 years) with paroxysmal (550) or persistent atrial fibrillation (583). Patients were grouped based on the INR on the day of RFA. There was a quadratic relationship between the INR and bleeding and vascular complications (P<0.001). Complications were less prevalent when INR was ≥2.0 and ≤3.0 (5% [31/572]) than when INR was <2.0 (10% [49/485]; P=0.004) and >3.0 (12% [9/76]; P=0.03). The prevalence of pericardial tamponade (1%) was similar at all INRs. From the quadratic model, the optimal range of INR was calculated as 2.1 to 2.5. INRs<2.0 and >3.0 were associated with a >2-fold increase in complications, with a further steep rise beyond an INR>3.5. Concomitant clopidogrel use was associated with a significant increase in complications at all INRs (odds ratio=3.1; ±95% confidence interval, 1.4-7.4). Unfractionated heparin requirements to maintain a therapeutic activated clotting time during RFA was reduced by 50% in patients with an INR>2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal INR range during uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation using warfarin is narrow. Therefore, INR levels should be carefully monitored in preparation for RFA of atrial fibrillation.

摘要

背景

与暂时停用华法林相比,在射频导管消融(RFA)治疗心房颤动期间持续抗凝可降低围手术期并发症的风险。然而,RFA 期间最佳的国际标准化比值(INR)水平尚未确定。

方法和结果

在这项回顾性分析中,对 1133 例连续阵发性(550 例)或持续性心房颤动(583 例)患者进行了 RFA。根据 RFA 当天的 INR 将患者分组。INR 与出血和血管并发症呈二次关系(P<0.001)。当 INR 为≥2.0 且≤3.0 时(5%[31/572])并发症发生率低于 INR<2.0 时(10%[49/485];P=0.004)和 INR>3.0 时(12%[9/76];P=0.03)。所有 INR 时心包填塞(1%)的发生率相似。从二次模型中计算出 INR 的最佳范围为 2.1 至 2.5。INR<2.0 和>3.0 与并发症发生率增加>2 倍相关,INR>3.5 时进一步急剧上升。在所有 INR 时,联合使用氯吡格雷与并发症发生率显著增加相关(比值比=3.1;95%置信区间,1.4-7.4)。在 INR>2.0 的患者中,维持 RFA 期间治疗性激活凝血时间所需的未分级肝素用量减少了 50%。

结论

在使用华法林进行不间断围手术期抗凝期间,最佳 INR 范围较窄。因此,在准备 RFA 治疗心房颤动之前,应仔细监测 INR 水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验