Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, Fricke O, Franklin J, Schönau E, Eysel P
Unireha, Paediatric Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Lindenburger Allee 44, 50931, Cologne, Germany,
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2360-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2693-9. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
Scoliosis of the vertebral column can be assessed with the Cobb angle (Cobb 1948). This examination is performed manually by measuring the angle on radiographs and is considered the gold standard. However, studies evaluating the reproducibility of this procedure have shown high variability in intra- and inter-observer agreement. Because of technical advancements, interests in new procedures to determine the Cobb angle has been renewed. This review aims to systematically investigate the reproducibility of various new techniques to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis and to assess whether new technical procedures are reasonable alternatives when compared to manual measurement of the Cobb angle.
Systematic review. Studies examining procedures used to determine the Cobb angle were selected. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Statistical results of reliability and agreement were summarised and described.
Eleven studies of new measuring procedures were included, all reporting the reproducibility. The new procedures can be divided into computer-assisted procedures, automatic procedures and smartphone apps.
All investigated measuring procedures showed high degrees of reliability. In general, digital procedures tend to be slightly better than manual ones. For all other measurement procedures (automatic or smartphone), results varied. Studies implementing vertebral pre-selection and observer training achieved better agreement.
脊柱侧弯可通过Cobb角进行评估(Cobb,1948年)。该检查通过在X线片上测量角度手动进行,被视为金标准。然而,评估该程序可重复性的研究表明,观察者内和观察者间的一致性存在很大差异。由于技术进步,人们对确定Cobb角的新程序重新产生了兴趣。本综述旨在系统地研究各种确定特发性脊柱侧弯Cobb角新技术的可重复性,并评估与手动测量Cobb角相比,新技术程序是否是合理的替代方法。
系统综述。选择研究用于确定Cobb角的程序的研究。两位综述作者独立选择纳入研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。总结并描述可靠性和一致性的统计结果。
纳入了11项关于新测量程序的研究,均报告了可重复性。新程序可分为计算机辅助程序、自动程序和智能手机应用程序。
所有调查的测量程序都显示出高度的可靠性。一般来说,数字程序往往比手动程序稍好。对于所有其他测量程序(自动或智能手机),结果各不相同。实施椎体预选择和观察者培训的研究取得了更好的一致性。