Jones Luke D, Grammatopoulos George, Kambouroglou Gregoris
, Oxford, UK,
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Apr;24(3):323-9. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1191-4. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
To compare clinical outcomes between titanium elastic nails (TENS), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and non-operative treatment options at mean 30 months in Allman type 1 fractures of the clavicle.
Retrospective case matched.
Tertiary Trauma Centre, UK.
Treatment method was based on surgeon choice although there was no difference between groups in terms of age or gender. Those treated non-operatively tended to have a less severe fracture pattern. There were 25 patients treated with TENS, 24 with ORIF and 41 treated conservatively. Main outcome measurements are qDASH questionnaire, patient satisfaction question and clinical complication rate.
Patients managed with TENS had significantly better clinical outcomes than both plate fixation and non-operatively managed groups.
This study supports the use of TENS fixation of middle third clavicle fractures in significantly displaced Allman type 1 injuries.
比较钛弹性髓内钉(TENS)、切开复位内固定(ORIF)及非手术治疗方法在锁骨Allman 1型骨折平均30个月时的临床疗效。
回顾性病例匹配研究。
英国三级创伤中心。
治疗方法由外科医生选择,尽管各组在年龄或性别方面无差异。非手术治疗的患者骨折类型往往较轻。25例患者接受TENS治疗,24例接受ORIF治疗,41例接受保守治疗。主要结局指标为qDASH问卷、患者满意度问题及临床并发症发生率。
接受TENS治疗的患者临床疗效明显优于钢板固定组和非手术治疗组。
本研究支持在Allman 1型明显移位的锁骨中1/3骨折中使用TENS固定。