Departments of *Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy †Prosthetic Dentistry ‡Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Clin J Pain. 2013 Dec;29(12):1057-65. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182850559.
Cognitive-behavioral treatment has proven efficacy for chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD). However, most patients receive dental treatment that may not address psychological comorbidities often present in TMD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback-based cognitive-behavioral treatment (BFB-CBT) versus dental treatment with occlusal splint (OS). Moreover, changes in nocturnal masseter muscle activity (NMMA) were investigated.
Fifty-eight patients with chronic TMD were randomly assigned to receive either 8 weekly sessions of BFB-CBT or 8 weeks of OS treatment. Diagnoses were established using Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. Pain intensity and disability were defined as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included emotional functioning, pain coping, somatoform symptoms, treatment satisfaction, and adverse events. NMMA was assessed during 3 nights pretreatment and posttreatment with portable devices. Follow-up assessment took place 6 months after the treatment.
Both treatments resulted in significant reductions in pain intensity and disability, with similar amounts of clinically meaningful improvement (45% for BFB-CBT and 48% for OS). Patients receiving BFB-CBT showed significantly larger improvements in pain coping skills. Satisfaction with treatment and ratings of improvement were higher for BFB-CBT. Effects were stable over 6 months, and tended to be larger in the BFB-CBT group for all outcomes. No significant changes were observed in NMMA.
The fact that BFB-CBT resulted in larger improvements in pain coping skills, and was well accepted by the patients, underlines the importance and feasibility of psychological treatments in the clinical management of TMD.
认知行为疗法已被证明对慢性颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)有效。然而,大多数患者接受的牙科治疗可能无法解决 TMD 中常见的心理共病。本研究旨在评估基于生物反馈的认知行为治疗(BFB-CBT)与咬合夹板(OS)治疗的疗效。此外,还研究了夜间咬肌肌活动(NMMA)的变化。
58 例慢性 TMD 患者随机分为接受 8 周 BFB-CBT 或 8 周 OS 治疗。使用 TMD 研究诊断标准进行诊断。疼痛强度和残疾被定义为主要结果。次要结果包括情绪功能、疼痛应对、躯体症状、治疗满意度和不良事件。使用便携式设备在治疗前和治疗后 3 晚评估 NMMA。治疗后 6 个月进行随访评估。
两种治疗均显著降低疼痛强度和残疾程度,具有相似的临床意义改善程度(BFB-CBT 为 45%,OS 为 48%)。接受 BFB-CBT 的患者在疼痛应对技能方面的改善明显更大。治疗满意度和改善评分更高的是 BFB-CBT。疗效稳定 6 个月,BFB-CBT 组在所有结果上的疗效均较大。NMMA 无明显变化。
BFB-CBT 导致疼痛应对技能显著改善,且被患者广泛接受,这强调了心理治疗在 TMD 临床管理中的重要性和可行性。