• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低水平炎症与降压治疗的动态血压反应:ALPHABET 研究。

Low-grade inflammation and ambulatory blood pressure response to antihypertensive treatment: the ALPHABET study.

机构信息

Yanai Municipal Heigun Clinic, Yamaguchi, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2013 Jun;26(6):784-92. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt024. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpt024
PMID:23446957
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined whether the level of highsensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker of low-grade inflammation, predicted the response of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) to antihypertensive treatment.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial was performed in 88 hypertensive patients (mean age = 63.4 years) allocated to receive losartan 50 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 4 weeks, and each treatment was changed to losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg in combination or amlodipine 10 mg for a further 4 weeks. Clinic and ambulatory BP were measured before and after 8 weeks of treatment, and hsCRP was measured at baseline.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into groups with hsCRP levels above and below the median (0.47 mg/L) for the study population. In the total population, 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) (P = 0.03) and daytime SBP (P = 0.01) were significantly higher in the above-median hsCRP group after 8 weeks of treatment. In multivariable regression analysis, baseline hsCRP was a significant determinant of the percentage change in daytime SBP (β = 0.29; P = 0.02) in the total population. In the losartan/HCTZ treatment group, changes in 24-hour SBP, daytime SBP, and diastolic BP were significantly smaller in the above-median hsCRP group than the below-median hsCRP group, whereas the amlodipine group did not show these differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline low-grade inflammation in patients with hypertension was associated with a poor ambulatory BP response, especially with losartan/HCTZ treatment. Initial measurement of hsCRP could be useful for selection of an appropriate antihypertensive drug.

摘要

背景

我们研究了高敏 C 反应蛋白(hsCRP)水平(一种低度炎症的标志物)是否可预测诊室和动态血压(BP)对降压治疗的反应。

方法

在 88 例高血压患者(平均年龄=63.4 岁)中进行了一项随机、开放标签、多中心试验,患者被分配接受氯沙坦 50mg 或氨氯地平 5mg 治疗 4 周,然后将每种治疗方案转换为氯沙坦 50mg/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)12.5mg 联合治疗或氨氯地平 10mg 治疗 4 周。治疗前和治疗 8 周后测量诊室和动态血压,并在基线时测量 hsCRP。

结果

患者根据研究人群中 hsCRP 水平的中位数(0.47mg/L)分为 hsCRP 水平高于和低于中位数的两组。在全人群中,治疗 8 周后,hsCRP 水平高于中位数组的 24 小时收缩压(SBP)(P=0.03)和白天 SBP(P=0.01)显著升高。多变量回归分析显示,基线 hsCRP 是全人群日间 SBP 变化百分比的显著决定因素(β=0.29;P=0.02)。在氯沙坦/HCTZ 治疗组中,hsCRP 水平高于中位数组的 24 小时 SBP、白天 SBP 和舒张压变化显著小于 hsCRP 水平低于中位数组,而氨氯地平组则没有这些差异。

结论

高血压患者的基线低度炎症与较差的动态血压反应相关,尤其是在接受氯沙坦/HCTZ 治疗时。hsCRP 的初始测量可能有助于选择合适的降压药物。

相似文献

1
Low-grade inflammation and ambulatory blood pressure response to antihypertensive treatment: the ALPHABET study.低水平炎症与降压治疗的动态血压反应:ALPHABET 研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Jun;26(6):784-92. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt024. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Efficacy and effects on lipid metabolism of combination treatment with losartan + hydrochlorothiazide versus losartan + amlodipine: a 48-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.氯沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氯沙坦联合氨氯地平治疗的疗效及对血脂代谢的影响:一项 48 周前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签试验。
Clin Ther. 2013 Apr;35(4):461-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.02.021. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
Differential effects of strict blood pressure lowering by losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and high-dose amlodipine monotherapy on microalbuminuria: the ALPHABET study.氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合治疗与大剂量氨氯地平单药治疗严格降压对微量白蛋白尿的不同影响:ALPHABET研究
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2012 Jan-Feb;6(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
4
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
5
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
7
Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study.力滴定缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平/氢氯噻嗪对2期高血压患者动态血压的影响:EVALUATE研究
Blood Press Monit. 2009 Jun;14(3):112-20. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832a9da7.
8
Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.通过24小时动态血压监测评估依那普利10毫克/尼群地平20毫克固定剂量复方制剂与氯沙坦50毫克/氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克对原发性高血压患者的降压效果比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Mar;18(3):215-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001655.
9
Comparison of 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Blood Pressure Reduction Efficacy Between Fixed Amlodipine or Up-Titrated Hydrochlorothiazide Plus Losartan: The K-Central Study.固定剂量氨氯地平或滴定剂量氢氯噻嗪联合氯沙坦的 24 小时动态中心血压降低疗效比较:K-Central 研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Sep 24;32(10):992-1002. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz050.
10
[Possibilities of rational combination antihypertensive therapy: results of HEMERA international clinical trial].[合理联合抗高血压治疗的可能性:HEMERA国际临床试验结果]
Ter Arkh. 2013;85(10):10-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroimmune crosstalk in the pathophysiology of hypertension.神经免疫相互作用与高血压的病理生理学。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019 Aug;16(8):476-490. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0178-1.