Suppr超能文献

固定剂量氨氯地平或滴定剂量氢氯噻嗪联合氯沙坦的 24 小时动态中心血压降低疗效比较:K-Central 研究。

Comparison of 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Blood Pressure Reduction Efficacy Between Fixed Amlodipine or Up-Titrated Hydrochlorothiazide Plus Losartan: The K-Central Study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2019 Sep 24;32(10):992-1002. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz050.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to evaluate non-inferiority of office mean systolic blood pressure (BP) reduction efficacy and superiority of 24-hour ambulatory central BP reduction efficacy between losartan combined with fixed dose amlodipine (L/A group) and dose up-titrated hydrochlorothiazide (L/H group) according to office BP.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter trial in 231 patients with hypertensive (mean age = 59.2 ± 12.2 years). Patients received losartan 50 mg monotherapy for 4 weeks, followed by additional use of amlodipine 5 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 20 weeks after randomization. The patients who did not achieve the BP goal after 4 weeks' randomization received an increased dose of 100 mg/5 mg for the L/A group and 100 mg/25 mg for L/H group, respectively. The 24-hour ambulatory central BP was measured at baseline and after 20 weeks' treatment.

RESULTS

Office mean systolic BP reduction of L/A group was not inferior to L/H group after 4 weeks' treatment (-17.6 ± 13.3 vs. -14.4 ± 12.6 mm Hg, P = 0.0863) and was not significantly different after 20 weeks' treatment. (-15.7 ± 14.0 vs. -14.7 ± 15.1 mm Hg, P = 0.6130) The 24-hour ambulatory central systolic BP was significantly more reduced in the L/A group compared with that in the L/H group after 20 weeks' treatment (-9.37 ± 10.67 vs. -6.28 ± 10.50 mm Hg, P = 0.0407). The 24-hour ambulatory central systolic BP at the completion of the study and its reduction magnitude were independently associated with reductions in aortic pulse wave velocity, pulse pressure, and wave reflection magnitude.

CONCLUSION

Office systolic BP reduction with L/A was not inferior to L/H after 4 week's treatment. The combination of losartan and amlodipine was more favorable in 24-hour ambulatory central hemodynamics beyond BP-lowering efficacy than the combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide, regardless of office BP.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02294539.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估根据诊室血压,氯沙坦联合固定剂量氨氯地平(L/A 组)与剂量滴定氢氯噻嗪(L/H 组)相比,诊室平均收缩压(BP)降低疗效的非劣效性和 24 小时动态中心 BP 降低疗效的优越性。

方法

我们在 231 例高血压患者(平均年龄=59.2±12.2 岁)中进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心试验。患者接受氯沙坦 50mg 单药治疗 4 周,随后根据随机分组,加用氨氯地平 5mg 或氢氯噻嗪 12.5mg 治疗 20 周。4 周随机分组后未达到 BP 目标的患者,分别增加剂量至 L/A 组 100mg/5mg 和 L/H 组 100mg/25mg。在基线和 20 周治疗后测量 24 小时动态中心 BP。

结果

L/A 组治疗 4 周后诊室平均收缩压降低不劣于 L/H 组(-17.6±13.3 与-14.4±12.6mmHg,P=0.0863),20 周治疗后无显著差异(-15.7±14.0 与-14.7±15.1mmHg,P=0.6130)。20 周治疗后,L/A 组 24 小时动态中心收缩压较 L/H 组显著降低(-9.37±10.67 与-6.28±10.50mmHg,P=0.0407)。研究结束时的 24 小时动态中心收缩压及其降低幅度与主动脉脉搏波速度、脉压和波反射幅度的降低独立相关。

结论

治疗 4 周后,L/A 组诊室收缩压降低不劣于 L/H 组。与氯沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪相比,氯沙坦联合氨氯地平在降压疗效以外的 24 小时动态中心血流动力学方面更为有利,而与诊室 BP 无关。

临床试验注册

NCT02294539。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a25/6758941/f21b2f314310/hpz050f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验