• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎穿刺与CT阴性蛛网膜下腔出血的诊断:是时候采用新方法了吗?

Lumbar puncture and the diagnosis of CT negative subarachnoid haemorrhage: time for a new approach?

作者信息

Ditta M, Galea J, Holland J, Patel H C

机构信息

University of Manchester, School of Medicine, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;27(5):599-602. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.771137. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

DOI:10.3109/02688697.2013.771137
PMID:23448246
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Because of potential risks of poor outcome, lumbar puncture (LP) is recommended to exclude the presence of blood breakdown products in patients with suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and a normal CT scan. The aim of this study was to document how often this test proved useful.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data was conducted. Patients with suspected SAH and a normal CT scan in whom LP was recommended between May 2008 and May 2010 were identified using the neurosurgical referral database. CT scan results, LP results, inpatient stay, investigations and interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-three patients were identified in whom LP was recommended after a reported negative CT scan. Thirty-six of these 163 patients had a positive LP of which seven had evidence of SAH on the initial CT scan. In 66 patients, the LP was not diagnostic and 59/66 (90%) patients underwent secondary imaging in whom five with aneurysms were identified and treated.

CONCLUSION

LP-driven decision making in patients with a normal scan and suspected SAH is suboptimal in over a third of cases. Patients with a non-diagnostic LP harboured five aneurysms that merited treatment. These results support the need for secondary investigations following suspected SAH, but suggest that these could take the form of secondary imaging rather than a lumbar puncture.

摘要

目的

鉴于预后不良的潜在风险,对于疑似蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)且CT扫描正常的患者,建议进行腰椎穿刺(LP)以排除血液分解产物的存在。本研究的目的是记录该检查证明有用的频率。

方法

对前瞻性记录的数据进行回顾性分析。使用神经外科转诊数据库识别出2008年5月至2010年5月期间推荐进行LP检查的疑似SAH且CT扫描正常的患者。记录CT扫描结果、LP结果、住院时间、检查和干预措施。

结果

确定了163例在报告CT扫描阴性后推荐进行LP检查的患者。这163例患者中有36例LP结果为阳性,其中7例在初始CT扫描时有SAH证据。在66例患者中,LP检查未得出诊断结果,66例中的59例(90%)患者接受了二次影像学检查,其中5例发现动脉瘤并接受了治疗。

结论

对于扫描正常且疑似SAH的患者,由LP检查驱动的决策在超过三分之一的病例中并非最佳选择。LP检查未得出诊断结果的患者中有5例动脉瘤值得治疗。这些结果支持在疑似SAH后需要进行二次检查,但表明这些检查可以采取二次影像学检查的形式,而不是腰椎穿刺。

相似文献

1
Lumbar puncture and the diagnosis of CT negative subarachnoid haemorrhage: time for a new approach?腰椎穿刺与CT阴性蛛网膜下腔出血的诊断:是时候采用新方法了吗?
Br J Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;27(5):599-602. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.771137. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
2
Acute headache and subarachnoid haemorrhage: a retrospective review of CT and lumbar puncture findings.急性头痛与蛛网膜下腔出血:CT及腰椎穿刺检查结果的回顾性分析
Scott Med J. 2005 Nov;50(4):151-3. doi: 10.1177/003693300505000405.
3
Subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis by computed tomography and lumbar puncture: are fifth generation CT scanners better at identifying subarachnoid hemorrhage?通过计算机断层扫描和腰椎穿刺诊断蛛网膜下腔出血:第五代CT扫描仪在识别蛛网膜下腔出血方面是否更具优势?
J Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;29(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.02.002.
4
Defending a traditional practice in the modern era: The use of lumbar puncture in the investigation of subarachnoid haemorrhage.捍卫现代社会中的传统做法:腰椎穿刺术在蛛网膜下腔出血检查中的应用
Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(6):799-803. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1084998. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Role of computed tomography before lumbar puncture: a survey of clinical practice.腰椎穿刺前计算机断层扫描的作用:临床实践调查
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Mar;82(965):162-5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.041046.
6
Utility of lumbar puncture after a normal brain computed tomography scan in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage: A new more rational approach?腰椎穿刺在疑似蛛网膜下腔出血患者急诊就诊时正常脑部计算机断层扫描后的应用:一种新的更合理的方法?
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Oct;32(5):756-762. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13502. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds.自发性蛛网膜下腔出血:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,描述病史、体格检查、影像学检查及腰椎穿刺的诊断准确性并探索检查阈值
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;23(9):963-1003. doi: 10.1111/acem.12984. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for evaluation of suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department.疑似蛛网膜下腔出血患者在急诊科评估的诊断策略的成本效益。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(10):1134-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01455.x.
9
Risk-benefit analysis of lumbar puncture to evaluate for nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in adult ED patients.对成年急诊患者进行腰椎穿刺以评估非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血的风险效益分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;33(11):1597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.048. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
10
Appreciation of CT-negative, lumbar puncture-positive subarachnoid haemorrhage: risk factors for presence of aneurysms and diagnostic yield of imaging.CT 阴性、腰椎穿刺阳性的蛛网膜下腔出血的评估:动脉瘤存在的危险因素和影像学检查的诊断率。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;85(8):885-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305955. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Shifts in Diagnostic Testing for Headache in the Emergency Department, 2015 to 2021.2015 年至 2021 年急诊科头痛诊断检测的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7373.
2
Lumbar puncture-verified subarachnoid hemorrhage: bleeding sources, need of radiological examination, and functional recovery.腰椎穿刺证实的蛛网膜下腔出血:出血源、影像学检查的必要性和功能恢复。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Jul;165(7):1847-1854. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05640-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
Subarachnoid haemorrhage guidelines and clinical practice: a cross-sectional study of emergency department consultants' and neurospecialists' views and risk tolerances.
蛛网膜下腔出血指南与临床实践:急诊科顾问医生和神经专科医生观点及风险承受能力的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e012357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012357.