• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合重复经颅磁刺激听觉皮层和前额叶皮层治疗抑郁症患者耳鸣:一项初步研究。

Combined rTMS to the auditory cortex and prefrontal cortex for tinnitus control in patients with depression: a pilot study.

作者信息

Park Sera, Park Hae-Jung, Kyeong Sung-Hyon, Moon In Seok, Kim Minbum, Kim Hee Nam, Choi Jae-Young

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun;133(6):600-6. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.763181. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

DOI:10.3109/00016489.2012.763181
PMID:23448323
Abstract

CONCLUSION

The study showed that combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the auditory cortex and prefrontal cortex has more benefit than rTMS on the auditory cortex alone for tinnitus control in patients with depression. Further studies for the most optimal combination of stimulation on both areas are needed.

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies suggest that the neuronal network changes of chronic tinnitus are beyond the auditory pathway. There is increasing evidences for the application of rTMS on multiple brain cortices in addition to the auditory cortex for the treatment of tinnitus. Sequential rTMS was performed on the auditory cortex alone as well as the auditory cortex combined with prefrontal cortex in patients with both chronic tinnitus and depression.

METHODS

Patients who presented with chronic tinnitus of more than 1 year were enrolled in the present study (seven males, four females; mean age 54 years). To select the site for the rTMS, PET CT was performed. Patients received the first rTMS on the primary auditory cortex for 5 days and on the primary auditory cortex and prefrontal cortex in the second application after tinnitus relapse. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were evaluated before and after rTMS.

RESULTS

The mean THI score of the eight patients with depression changed from 77.5 ± 15 to 61.8 ± 20.1 after the second rTMS. There was statistical significance only for the second rTMS. The VAS score changed from 8.6 ± 1.6 to 6.3 ± 1.8 after the first rTMS and from 7.6 ± 2.4 to 4.6 ± 2.7 after the second rTMS, showing statistically significant changes both times. The THI changes after the second rTMS were greater than after the first rTMS, and the changes in VAS score showed a similar pattern. The changes in BDI score, which indicates the severity of depression, showed a variable pattern after rTMS. Patients with mild depression (10≤ BDI score <16, n = 4) showed significant improvement of THI with the second combined rTMS (ΔTHI = 24.5) as compared with the first rTMS on the auditory area (ΔTHI = 6). In contrast, combined rTMS did not show any better improvement on THI (ΔTHI = 6.5) than the first rTMS on the auditory cortex (ΔTHI = 7) in patients without depression (BDI <10, n = 3) and patients with moderate to severe depression (BDI ≥16, n = 4).

摘要

结论

研究表明,对于抑郁症患者的耳鸣控制,在听觉皮层和前额叶皮层联合进行重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)比仅在听觉皮层进行rTMS更有益。需要进一步研究这两个区域刺激的最佳组合。

目的

最近的研究表明,慢性耳鸣的神经网络变化超出了听觉通路。越来越多的证据表明,除了听觉皮层外,在多个脑皮层应用rTMS治疗耳鸣。对患有慢性耳鸣和抑郁症的患者,分别单独在听觉皮层以及在听觉皮层与前额叶皮层联合进行序贯rTMS。

方法

本研究纳入了患有超过1年慢性耳鸣的患者(男性7例,女性4例;平均年龄54岁)。为选择rTMS的部位,进行了PET CT检查。患者在初次rTMS时在初级听觉皮层进行5天治疗,耳鸣复发后第二次治疗时在初级听觉皮层和前额叶皮层进行。在rTMS前后评估耳鸣障碍量表(THI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)。

结果

8例抑郁症患者的平均THI评分在第二次rTMS后从77.5±15降至61.8±20.1。仅第二次rTMS有统计学意义。VAS评分在第一次rTMS后从8.6±1.6降至6.3±1.8,在第二次rTMS后从7.6±2.4降至4.6±2.7,两次均显示有统计学意义的变化。第二次rTMS后THI的变化大于第一次rTMS后,VAS评分的变化呈现类似模式。表明抑郁严重程度的BDI评分变化在rTMS后呈现可变模式。轻度抑郁症患者(10≤BDI评分<16,n = 4)在第二次联合rTMS后THI有显著改善(ΔTHI = 24.5),相比在听觉区域的第一次rTMS(ΔTHI = 6)。相比之下,在无抑郁症患者(BDI<10,n = 3)和中度至重度抑郁症患者(BDI≥16,n = 4)中,联合rTMS在THI改善方面(ΔTHI = 6.5)并不比在听觉皮层的第一次rTMS(ΔTHI = 7)更好。

相似文献

1
Combined rTMS to the auditory cortex and prefrontal cortex for tinnitus control in patients with depression: a pilot study.联合重复经颅磁刺激听觉皮层和前额叶皮层治疗抑郁症患者耳鸣:一项初步研究。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun;133(6):600-6. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.763181. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
2
Comparison of the outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the ipsilateral and contralateral auditory cortex in unilateral tinnitus.单侧耳鸣患者中重复经颅磁刺激同侧和对侧听觉皮层的疗效比较。
Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Sep;33(3):211-5. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.801353. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
3
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Following Either Prefrontal Cortical-only or Dual-site Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus Patients: A Double-blind Randomized Study.慢性耳鸣患者仅前额叶皮质或双部位重复经颅磁刺激治疗结果的比较:一项双盲随机研究
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Feb;38(2):296-303. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001266.
4
Dual-site rTMS is More Effective than Single-site rTMS in Tinnitus Patients: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.双部位 rTMS 比单部位 rTMS 治疗耳鸣患者更有效:一项盲法随机对照试验。
Brain Topogr. 2020 Nov;33(6):767-775. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00797-y. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
The effect of rTMS on auditory processing in adults with chronic, bilateral tinnitus: a placebo-controlled pilot study.rTMS 对慢性双侧耳鸣成人听觉处理的影响:一项安慰剂对照的初步研究。
Brain Stimul. 2013 Sep;6(5):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic tinnitus: a randomized, placebo controlled study.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性慢性耳鸣的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2010;31(2):238-49.
7
Combined temporal and prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus treatment: a pilot study.颞叶和前额叶联合经颅磁刺激治疗耳鸣:一项初步研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;138(4):497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.022.
8
Navigated rTMS for the treatment of tinnitus: a pilot study with assessment by fMRI and AEPs.经颅磁刺激导航治疗耳鸣:一项 fMRI 和 AEP 评估的初步研究。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2012 Apr;42(3):95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
9
Difference in Tinnitus Treatment Outcome According to the Pulse Number of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.根据重复经颅磁刺激的脉冲数对耳鸣治疗结果的差异
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(8):1450-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000802.
10
Bilateral low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the auditory cortex in tinnitus patients is not effective: a randomised controlled trial.双侧低频重复经颅磁刺激听觉皮层治疗耳鸣患者无效:一项随机对照试验。
Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(6):362-73. doi: 10.1159/000354977. Epub 2013 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential Prefrontal and Temporoparietal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment of Tinnitus With and Without Comorbid Depression: A Case Series and Systematic Review.序贯性前额叶和颞顶叶重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗伴或不伴共病抑郁的耳鸣:病例系列与系统评价
Front Neurol. 2022 May 19;13:831832. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.831832. eCollection 2022.
2
Case Report: Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Auditory Cortex in a Patient With Tinnitus and Depression.病例报告:对一名患有耳鸣和抑郁症的患者的背外侧前额叶皮层和听觉皮层进行低频重复经颅磁刺激
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 9;13:847618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.847618. eCollection 2022.
3
A Computational Framework for Controlling the Self-Restorative Brain Based on the Free Energy and Degeneracy Principles.
基于自由能和简并性原理控制自我修复大脑的计算框架。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2021 Apr 14;15:590019. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.590019. eCollection 2021.
4
RTMS parameters in tinnitus trials: a systematic review.耳鸣试验中的重复经颅磁刺激参数:系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 21;9(1):12190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48750-9.
5
Adjunctive Role of Bifrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Distressed Patients with Severe Tinnitus.双额经颅直流电刺激在伴有严重耳鸣的痛苦患者中的辅助作用。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jan 4;34(3):e19. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e19. eCollection 2019 Jan 21.
6
Use of cortical stimulation in neuropathic pain, tinnitus, depression, and movement disorders.皮质刺激在神经性疼痛、耳鸣、抑郁和运动障碍中的应用。
Neurotherapeutics. 2014 Jul;11(3):564-71. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0283-0.