Warwick Richard, Mediratta Neeraj, Chalmers John, Pullan Mark, Shaw Matthew, McShane James, Poullis Michael
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;16(6):765-71. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt062. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
Publications in the surgical literature are very consistent in their conclusions that blood is dangerous with regard to in-hospital mortality, morbidity and long-term survival. Blood is frequently used as a volume expander while simultaneously increasing the haematocrit. We investigated the effects of a single-unit blood transfusion on long-term survival post-cardiac surgery in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients.
A prospective single-institution cardiac surgery database was analysed involving 4615 patients. Univariate, multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis and propensity matching were performed to identify whether a single-unit blood transfusion was detrimental to long-term survival.
Univariate analysis revealed that blood was significantly associated with a reduced long-term survival even with a single-unit transfused, P = 0.0001. Cox multivariate regression analysis identified age, ejection fraction, preoperative dialysis, logistic EuroSCORE, postoperative CKMB, blood transfusion, urgent operative status and atrial fibrillation as significant factors determining long-term survival. When the Cox regression was repeated with patients who received no blood or only one unit of blood, transfusion was not a risk factor for long-term survival. An interaction analysis revealed that blood transfusion was significantly interacting with preoperative haemoglobin levels, P = 0.02. Propensity analysis demonstrated that a single-unit transfusion is not associated with a detrimental long-term survival, P = 0.3.
Cox regression and propensity matching both indicate that a single-unit transfusion is not a significant cause of reduced long-term survival. Preoperative anaemia is a significant confounding factor. Despite demonstrating the negligible risks of a single-unit blood transfusion, we are not advocating liberal transfusion and would recommend changing from a double-unit to a single-unit transfusion policy. We speculate that blood is not bad, but that the underlying reason that it is given might be.
外科文献中的出版物在其结论上非常一致,即血液在医院死亡率、发病率和长期生存率方面存在危险。血液经常被用作容量扩张剂,同时提高血细胞比容。我们研究了单单位输血对孤立性冠状动脉搭桥手术患者心脏手术后长期生存的影响。
分析了一个前瞻性单机构心脏手术数据库,涉及4615例患者。进行单因素、多因素逐步Cox回归分析和倾向匹配,以确定单单位输血是否对长期生存有害。
单因素分析显示,即使输注单单位血液,血液也与长期生存率降低显著相关,P = 0.0001。Cox多因素回归分析确定年龄、射血分数、术前透析、逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)、术后肌酸激酶同工酶(CKMB)、输血、紧急手术状态和心房颤动是决定长期生存的重要因素。当对未输血或仅输一单位血的患者重复进行Cox回归时,输血不是长期生存的危险因素。交互分析显示,输血与术前血红蛋白水平存在显著交互作用,P = 0.02。倾向分析表明,单单位输血与长期生存有害无关,P = 0.3。
Cox回归和倾向匹配均表明,单单位输血不是长期生存率降低的重要原因。术前贫血是一个重要的混杂因素。尽管单单位输血的风险可忽略不计,但我们并不主张自由输血,建议从双单位输血政策改为单单位输血政策。我们推测血液本身并无坏处,但其输注的潜在原因可能存在问题。