Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥术后单次输血有害吗?

Is single-unit blood transfusion bad post-coronary artery bypass surgery?

作者信息

Warwick Richard, Mediratta Neeraj, Chalmers John, Pullan Mark, Shaw Matthew, McShane James, Poullis Michael

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;16(6):765-71. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt062. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Publications in the surgical literature are very consistent in their conclusions that blood is dangerous with regard to in-hospital mortality, morbidity and long-term survival. Blood is frequently used as a volume expander while simultaneously increasing the haematocrit. We investigated the effects of a single-unit blood transfusion on long-term survival post-cardiac surgery in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients.

METHODS

A prospective single-institution cardiac surgery database was analysed involving 4615 patients. Univariate, multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis and propensity matching were performed to identify whether a single-unit blood transfusion was detrimental to long-term survival.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that blood was significantly associated with a reduced long-term survival even with a single-unit transfused, P = 0.0001. Cox multivariate regression analysis identified age, ejection fraction, preoperative dialysis, logistic EuroSCORE, postoperative CKMB, blood transfusion, urgent operative status and atrial fibrillation as significant factors determining long-term survival. When the Cox regression was repeated with patients who received no blood or only one unit of blood, transfusion was not a risk factor for long-term survival. An interaction analysis revealed that blood transfusion was significantly interacting with preoperative haemoglobin levels, P = 0.02. Propensity analysis demonstrated that a single-unit transfusion is not associated with a detrimental long-term survival, P = 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Cox regression and propensity matching both indicate that a single-unit transfusion is not a significant cause of reduced long-term survival. Preoperative anaemia is a significant confounding factor. Despite demonstrating the negligible risks of a single-unit blood transfusion, we are not advocating liberal transfusion and would recommend changing from a double-unit to a single-unit transfusion policy. We speculate that blood is not bad, but that the underlying reason that it is given might be.

摘要

目的

外科文献中的出版物在其结论上非常一致,即血液在医院死亡率、发病率和长期生存率方面存在危险。血液经常被用作容量扩张剂,同时提高血细胞比容。我们研究了单单位输血对孤立性冠状动脉搭桥手术患者心脏手术后长期生存的影响。

方法

分析了一个前瞻性单机构心脏手术数据库,涉及4615例患者。进行单因素、多因素逐步Cox回归分析和倾向匹配,以确定单单位输血是否对长期生存有害。

结果

单因素分析显示,即使输注单单位血液,血液也与长期生存率降低显著相关,P = 0.0001。Cox多因素回归分析确定年龄、射血分数、术前透析、逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)、术后肌酸激酶同工酶(CKMB)、输血、紧急手术状态和心房颤动是决定长期生存的重要因素。当对未输血或仅输一单位血的患者重复进行Cox回归时,输血不是长期生存的危险因素。交互分析显示,输血与术前血红蛋白水平存在显著交互作用,P = 0.02。倾向分析表明,单单位输血与长期生存有害无关,P = 0.3。

结论

Cox回归和倾向匹配均表明,单单位输血不是长期生存率降低的重要原因。术前贫血是一个重要的混杂因素。尽管单单位输血的风险可忽略不计,但我们并不主张自由输血,建议从双单位输血政策改为单单位输血政策。我们推测血液本身并无坏处,但其输注的潜在原因可能存在问题。

相似文献

1
Is single-unit blood transfusion bad post-coronary artery bypass surgery?冠状动脉搭桥术后单次输血有害吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;16(6):765-71. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt062. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
7
Off-Pump Conversion: In-hospital Mortality and Long-Term Survival.非体外循环转换:院内死亡率和长期生存率
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(4):296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566742. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

5
Should we operate on microscopic N2 non-small cell lung cancer?对于微小N2期非小细胞肺癌,我们应该进行手术治疗吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jun;12(6):956-61; discussion 961. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.255323. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验