Suppr超能文献

等容等体温血液透析对对比计算机断层扫描和脉搏波速度评估的脑灌注和血管僵硬的影响。

Effect of isovolemic, isothermic hemodialysis on cerebral perfusion and vascular stiffness using contrast computed tomography and pulse wave velocity.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056396. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment have a six-fold increased risk for stroke relative to the general population. However, the effect of hemodialysis on cerebral blood flow is poorly studied and confounding factors like blood pressure and ultrafiltration as well as temperature changes have rarely been accounted for. The aim of our study was to use state-of-the-art technology to evaluate the effect of a single dialysis session on cerebral perfusion as well as on vascular stiffness.

METHODS

Chronic hemodialysis patients (7 male/3 female, mean age 58 years) were recruited. Cerebral blood flow and arterial pulse wave velocity were measured before and immediately after a hemodialysis session. To exclude effects of volume changes we kept ultrafiltration to a minimum, allowing no change in body weight. Isothermic conditions were maintained by using the GENIUS single-pass batch-dialysis system with a high-flux polysulfone dialyser. Cerebral blood flow was measured by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Pulse wave velocity was measured using the SphygmoCor (AtCor Medical, USA) device by a single operator.

RESULTS

This study shows for the first time that isovolemic, isothermic hemodialysis neither affected blood pressure or heart rate, nor total or regional cerebral perfusion. There was also no change in pulse wave velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanisms other than the dialysis procedure itself might be causative for the high incidence of ischemic strokes in this patient population. Moreover, the sole removal of uremic toxins does not lead to short-term effects on vascular stiffness, underlying the importance of volume control in this patient population.

摘要

背景

与普通人群相比,接受血液透析治疗的患者中风风险增加了六倍。然而,血液透析对脑血流的影响研究甚少,且很少考虑到血压和超滤等混杂因素以及温度变化。我们的研究旨在使用最先进的技术评估单次透析对脑灌注以及血管僵硬的影响。

方法

招募了慢性血液透析患者(7 名男性/3 名女性,平均年龄 58 岁)。在血液透析前后测量脑血流和动脉脉搏波速度。为了排除体积变化的影响,我们将超滤量控制在最低限度,使体重没有变化。通过使用 GENIUS 单次通过批量透析系统和高通量聚砜透析器保持等温热条件。使用对比增强计算机断层扫描测量脑血流。使用 SphygmoCor(美国 AtCor Medical)设备由单个操作人员测量脉搏波速度。

结果

本研究首次表明,等容、等温热血液透析既不影响血压或心率,也不影响总脑灌注或局部脑灌注。脉搏波速度也没有变化。

结论

除透析过程本身以外的机制可能是导致该患者人群中风发生率高的原因。此外,仅仅清除尿毒症毒素不会导致血管僵硬的短期影响,这凸显了该患者人群中容量控制的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2915/3579888/6f19973c4d36/pone.0056396.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验